Using a snip from MSL's pic, could not a reasonably accurate cell count be found by counting cells along the 2 lines i have drawn then multiplying? After squaring the comb using Little John's method?
I saw a poster about that one at Apimondia, but never did find the paper. Thanks for posting that link.Better yet use a rhombus! :lookout:
for those that don't get the joke https://www.researchgate.net/public...A_fatal_error_or_distortion_of_historical_dat
MSL is right. Good catch. Thanks.I have used 134 in the past based on a cad model , the one I just measured came to 136