I was wondering whether to put this or not on the not to do list for the future and you guys have added it.
I don't like divided small boxes especially 2 by 2 in 5 frame nuc... covers bending in the sun creating bee space above dividers(on 3 x 2 in standard box), not enough space for maneuvering the frames etc. I'm sure it fits the needs on larger queen operations but I won't use them again.
At first I thought I would not have enough boxes for the bees that's why I divided them. Another reason was that I really had no idea how bees really multiply in the Spring. So in conclusion I could have used standard boxes from the beginning, placing them on their final stands.
...
I'm thinking on using Michael Palmer/Kirk Webster/Peter Edwards/Cloake board/and who knows who else method of combined starter/finisher. I had some dramatic experiences forming the starter. As I don't have a bee suit and can't stand heat I've been stung a lot and I would better not do it again

.
I read Joseph Clemens method also.
...
My personal conclusion after reading all the above:
I still stick with the classical method. The only problems I need to solve to make it work more smoothly is better protection for myself + queen marking.
I will try to make some pictures with my new bee yard with lots of queenless nucs and hives

... and not to mention the chickens standing upon the more inactive ones :lpf:
Thanks a lot.