Joined
·
8 Posts
I had an experience this summer that prompted me to question whether I've been handling varroa in the right way. I hope some of you more experienced folks will share your views.
I've always thought I should assume my colonies are infested, that I should be asking how acute the infestation is, and that I should treat when a treatment threshold is measured. Natural mite drop is commonly described as a useful way to get a rough idea of the infestation level.
This summer I put sticky boards under three of my 28 colonies and got ZERO natural mite drop from any of them in 48 hours. I felt like this result was too good to be true, so I treated one with FormicPro and monitored mite drop. Sure enough, the treated hive dropped more mites than I cared to count in the first day of treatment. I then proceeded to treat all of my colonies.
I'm now questioning everything I know about varroa detection and treatment, and would appreciate your insight:
** Is natural mite drop a reliable method to measure mite loads? If so, I was below the treatment threshold, but wow - there were a lot of mites present! **
* Nectar flows/climate: The treatments I prefer have min/max temperature requirements. I don't want to treat during or for a couple weeks before a nectar flow if I'm going to harvest honey from the colony. My main spring nectar flow begins while it is still cool in late March/early April, so I don't have much opportunity in spring to treat with anything that has a minimum temperature requirement. I'm done harvesting by late June/early July and then we hit summer dearth and daytime highs frequently in excess of the treatment label maximums. There is not a significant fall flow. Thus, my best opportunities to treat are in early July and in late Sept/early Oct when the bees are not supered and the temps generally are within label requirements.
* Perhaps the early summer treatment should be viewed as the "primary" treatment and timed according to the bees' developmental stages. A secondary treatment in fall would then be administered if mite counts indicate one is needed?
I'll appreciate any insight you can share!
I've always thought I should assume my colonies are infested, that I should be asking how acute the infestation is, and that I should treat when a treatment threshold is measured. Natural mite drop is commonly described as a useful way to get a rough idea of the infestation level.
This summer I put sticky boards under three of my 28 colonies and got ZERO natural mite drop from any of them in 48 hours. I felt like this result was too good to be true, so I treated one with FormicPro and monitored mite drop. Sure enough, the treated hive dropped more mites than I cared to count in the first day of treatment. I then proceeded to treat all of my colonies.
I'm now questioning everything I know about varroa detection and treatment, and would appreciate your insight:
** Is natural mite drop a reliable method to measure mite loads? If so, I was below the treatment threshold, but wow - there were a lot of mites present! **
- If every colony is infested, why do we worry so much about treatment thresholds? If we don't treat, won't the fraction of infested bees increase over time - especially in periods when the queen is laying fewer eggs but foundress mites are still going strong?
- I now think there are two factors that should dictate treatment timing - and neither of them are based on measured mite loads:
* Nectar flows/climate: The treatments I prefer have min/max temperature requirements. I don't want to treat during or for a couple weeks before a nectar flow if I'm going to harvest honey from the colony. My main spring nectar flow begins while it is still cool in late March/early April, so I don't have much opportunity in spring to treat with anything that has a minimum temperature requirement. I'm done harvesting by late June/early July and then we hit summer dearth and daytime highs frequently in excess of the treatment label maximums. There is not a significant fall flow. Thus, my best opportunities to treat are in early July and in late Sept/early Oct when the bees are not supered and the temps generally are within label requirements.
* Perhaps the early summer treatment should be viewed as the "primary" treatment and timed according to the bees' developmental stages. A secondary treatment in fall would then be administered if mite counts indicate one is needed?
I'll appreciate any insight you can share!