The drawbacks to top entrances are:
</font>
- Dead bees and hive debris are never
removed as well, so the bottom board can
become less-than sanitary.</font>
- Since the bees learn to use the top
entrance, tearing down a hive suddenly
prompts the bees to attempt a landing
on the taller object, which would be the
beekeeper.</font>
- If comb honey is your goal, you get
more foot traffic over the comb, which
can lead to less-than show quality comb
honey (not a big deal if you pull your
comb honey just after it is capped)</font>
- A higher entrance means a tougher
job of shielding the entrance from
crosswinds. It gets windy here, so
wind can cut back on sorties, and hence
nectar gathering (as measured with
hive scales).</font>
- As far as mice go, mice can climb.
They have no problem climbing a hive,
so top entrances are not going to help
much if you have a mice/vole issue.</font>
If given both top and bottom entrances,
and/or Imire shims, some fraction of the
bees choose to use one of each entrance
provided. I think that this is the best
of all possible worlds, as the bees are not
stupid, and will pick the closest exit, with
pollen foragers using the lower entrances, and
nectar foragers using the upper ones.
So many beekeepers tout the "advantages" of
one thing or another, when stubborn implementation
of
ANY single approach can be observed
to have less-than consistent impact across
larger numbers of hives. So, if you have
a dozen or more hives, you start to see the
advantages of not imposing your will on the
bees in areas where doing so is merely
changing
the bee's infrastructure, not clearly
enhancing it.
I just notch my inner covers on those hives
with non-migratory covers, and insert a shim
on those with migratory covers. As only a
tiny number of hives consistently use only
one entrance or the other, I consider the
use of multiple entrances during "the season"
to be far superior in simple terms of
sorties per minute and better internal hive
traffic flow.