gee I was looking at the positive side, "The vaccine, which will initially be available to commercial beekeepers, aims to curb foulbrood, " , with the commercial beeks jumping on the bandwagon and them being the major supplier of nucs in NY, I figure we can get rid of the bee inspectors and that Illegal law they are running under, since the reason for the law was controlling AFB.I wonder what new problems this will cause future beekeepers?
don't know much about it, but if as the article says the queen passes it down to her eggs, eggs are where queens come from, if so, good chance once it's released Amibusiness and everyone else may have a chance to get it free.The USDA has granted a "conditional license" for a vaccine that will initiatially be available to commercial beekeepers. Any idea what the conditions are? In other words is it still in trials or is it approved for wide distribution? From what I read it is perhaps not a fait accompli.
I like how you have communicated. I’m still having a hard time how any of this gets dragged into the political arena. Some people think it’s science.So it can be tricky to keep bees and politics separate. This is slightly off topic but some may see the relationship...
I just filled out the NAAS survey. I assume it is related to ccd based on some of the questions. Isn't that a thing of the past? "Cc'd: the thing that killed my bees when I was too lazy to figure out what it really was. But I like it this way because I can get a hefty govt handout to pay for my laziness...."
It is a quarterly survey, so Oct - Dec. I am in NY.
Some of the questions that seem dumb to me: how many of my colonies were affected by mites? (All) How many colonies got nucs or packages added to them or were requeened? (Umm, none.) How many experienced a weather related forage shortage? (All)
So based on this research or data, what exactly is going to help us?
The same people who bring us the safe and effective vaccines (but we can't sue them if they malfunction) also want to ban homeopathic meds unless they go through rigorous testing (even though no adverse side effects have been reported). I don't think anyone should be forced to take homeopathy, whether it is safe or not. I think anyone should be able to take a vaccine that they have been educated about, whether it's safe or not (informed consent). The same goes for my bees. Don't ram any meds or GMOs down my throat without my informed consent. And don't cook the data to "prove" anything to me.
And I recognize that the mods have a tough job. I hope this does not come across as too political or inflammatory or uncivil. If it is I understand it needs to be deleted.
I would find it unfortunate if we are not allowed to have a conversation about this before we have no choice whether our bees are affected by it or not.
Thanks beesource, thanks mods.
Commercial demons, illegal laws, buying in based on one "source"? Come on now.gee I was looking at the positive side, "The vaccine, which will initially be available to commercial beekeepers, aims to curb foulbrood, " , with the commercial beeks jumping on the bandwagon and them being the major supplier of nucs in NY, I figure we can get rid of the bee inspectors and that Illegal law they are running under, since the reason for the law was controlling AFB.But on a lighter side, everyone that is not a fan had better start raising their own queens because I have no doubt the queen breeders will use it, gives them a really good advertisement when selling.
right agreeI felt that this piece of PR was an attempt at self fulfilling prophesy. Achieve acceptance before it was actually open for serious consideration.. deflect any opposition before it even appeared etc. First I heard of it and it appears as if a done deal. I question what nuance may be in the words "conditional license"! I dont have objections to the concept of vaccines in general but I would want to hear more about the degree of scrutiny that went into this product. I remember the horrors of Thalidomide! A vivid example of a hasty solution to a problem manageable without such possible unknown long term results.
This may be good but I sure as heck want to hear a lot more about it before I vote for it.![]()