so...basically.....they figured out how to cram new genetics into bees using...cassettes? What does that even mean though? Could anything helpful actually be inserted?
Schulte, C., Theilenberg, E., Müller-Borg, M., Gempe, T., & Beye, M. (2014). Highly efficient integration and expression of piggyBac-derived cassettes in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201402341.We report the first to our knowledge genetically engineered honeybees, which are important pollinators and interesting biological models for the study of social and complex behaviors as well as caste and sexual development. This genetic manipulation tool will enable systematic studies of biological processes in an organism building complex societies. We demonstrate highly efficient integration and expression of piggyBac-derived cassettes in the honeybee that make this system applicable to colony-based screening approaches and useful for an average beekeeping facility. This cassette was stably and efficiently transmitted and expressed in progeny by two different promoters, offering the prospect for activation or inhibition of gene functions under conditions of stage- and tissue-specific promoters.
dang I was hoping to use all my old Johnny Cash cassette, the outcome would have been wonderful.Gus, a cassette refers to the segments of genes put together by the researcher that integrate together.
At this point it is just proof of concept, they have perfected the skill necessary to alter the genome of the honeybee. This has been done in other animals for many years. The least common use is to alter plants or animals for food production. It is far more common to delete or disable particular genes to try to understand their function. For example, suppose there is a gene for defensive behavior. It might be possible to alter that behavior by modifying that gene. There are other less permanent ways to do this now, by altering gene expression with RNA, which only temporarily affects that gene pathway.What does that even mean though? Could anything helpful actually be inserted?
interesting, or catastrophicThis should be interesting.
One of the grandest catastrophes to befall the beekeeping world was the ordinary importation of bees from Africa to South America. In contrast, experimentation with genetically modified organisms is so highly regulated, almost no one can afford to do it.interesting, or catastrophic
Yep, this was a rel advance form the old method that used 8 track tapes!dang I was hoping to use all my old Johnny Cash cassette, the outcome would have been wonderful.
I disagree. The grandest catastrophes to befall the beekeeping world was the accidental release of 26 queens of the same imported strain of honeybees into the wild. The researchers that imported their bee stock no doubt certainly offered the same assurances that these research bees would never make it out of the lab.One of the grandest catastrophes to befall the beekeeping world was the ordinary importation of bees from Africa to South America. In contrast, experimentation with genetically modified organisms is so highly regulated, almost no one can afford to do it.
I don't think you know what you are talking about. The cover story was that the bees were accidentally released, whereas there is ample evidence that the bees were widely distributed on purpose.I disagree. The grandest catastrophes to befall the beekeeping world was the accidental release of 26 queens of the same imported strain of honeybees into the wild. The researchers that imported their bee stock no doubt certainly offered the same assurances that these research bees would never make it out of the lab.
Whether you think I know what I'm talking about or not is irrelevant. What is relevant is that we need absolute assurances that a release of genetically problematic bees, whether accidental or deliberate, can never happen again.I don't think you know what you are talking about. The cover story was that the bees were accidentally released, whereas there is ample evidence that the bees were widely distributed on purpose.
Control. Can't you all see where this is going?; and the fluorescent gene expression wrote of in post #6 in this thread is their mark of ownership. It looks like that fluorescent gene expression will be past on to any outside queens those drones mate with (our bees). Go figure. It might not be long before big companies will own the honeybees and it will be illegal for us to have them, unless we are leasing the bees from them or something I'm afraid.why are we screwing with 100 million year old animals!?
The research was done in Germany so you don't need to worry about the bees mating with "your bees." They took measures to prevent their escape in any case:It looks like that fluorescent gene expression will be past on to any outside queens those drones mate with (our bees). Go figure. It might not be long before big companies will own the honeybees and it will be illegal for us to have them, unless we are leasing the bees from them or something I'm afraid.
The fluorescent marker is a standard method of testing a technique. It has no effect on the animal, other than to make it glow in the dark, like a jellyfish. It couldn't be used for ID purposes, since it is already in widespread use in research.We used different containment procedures so that no transformed
bee could escape into nature. This includes a large closed flight cage
in which the nucleus hives with the transformed queens were kept. When the
queens were 8 d old, they were treated with CO2 for 7 min on two successive
days. This treatment induced the laying of unfertilized eggs, which developed
into drones.