Small Cell Claims Debunked
Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 365
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Posts
    1,222

    Default Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Interesting article by Keith DeLaplane in the April issue of ABJ regarding the use of small cell foundation and its effects on varroa mites. Here is a scientific study by an extremely knowledgeable leader in our industry stating "small cell foundation was shown to be ineffective in reducing mite populations"... He further states that he is unaware of any publicly accessible peer reviewed papers that directly support small cell efforts to reduce mite populations. Several years ago I purchased several hundred plastic small frames of foundations mainly because of the cost factor. In my case it was not a wise investment. The PF-100 and PF120's are problematic in my operation because of the ladder comb issue. Anyways, I am not trying to start WWIII regarding this debate, but it was an interesting (scientific) analysis. I have since sold almost all of my small cell plastic combs.
    "Tradition becomes our security, and when the mind is secure it is in decay".....Krishnamurti

  2. Remove Advertisements
    BeeSource.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Quote Originally Posted by Riskybizz View Post
    I am not trying to start WWIII regarding this debate
    That war has been fought on Beesource numerous times. Debate about the UGA, UFL and Cornell studies have been done and redone. I think....if it starts again....it'll actually be WWX.
    Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted. - Emerson

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Nehawka, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    53,768

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Here is a scientific study you may find interesting:

    Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
    http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/...l.pmed.0020124
    Michael Bush bushfarms.com/bees.htm "Everything works if you let it." ThePracticalBeekeeper.com 42y 40h 39yTF

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Posts
    1,222

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    "There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false"

    If we are to buy into this research finding, then it, by its own determination would then be false. Perhaps the DeLaplane study is not "most"?
    "Tradition becomes our security, and when the mind is secure it is in decay".....Krishnamurti

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    London, United Kingdom
    Posts
    247

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    I don't about anything else, but what I do know is that small cells mean more bees per comb. Less distance needs to be travelled by queen. That should make for a larger workforce.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    411

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Quote Originally Posted by Riskybizz View Post
    . The PF-100 and PF120's are problematic in my operation because of the ladder comb issue. .
    What is ladder comb?

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Pinellass County, Florida
    Posts
    1,237

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Quote Originally Posted by SallyD View Post
    What is ladder comb?
    Some call it ''burr''.
    It's the comb the bees make that connects
    one box to the next from the top of one frame to the bottom of the top box frame
    Without excluder the Quenn uses it often to go back and forth

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Nehawka, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    53,768

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    >If we are to buy into this research finding, then it, by its own determination would then be false. Perhaps the DeLaplane study is not "most"?

    Yes, it is a bit of a dilemma to have a peer reviewed scientific study that shows that peer reviewed scientific studies are usually wrong... The study shows the causes and how to predict the likelihood. Some of those things like the length of the study and the scope of the study are very applicable to bee research. I would say anything involving bees that is less 100 hives for less than five years is probably not very accurate.

    >The PF-100 and PF120's are problematic in my operation because of the ladder comb issue. .

    This problem is the same with all plastic frames, Pierco etc. have the same problem. I don't find it to be a problem if you expect it... you just pry all the frames below, down before lifting the box.
    Michael Bush bushfarms.com/bees.htm "Everything works if you let it." ThePracticalBeekeeper.com 42y 40h 39yTF

  10. #9

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Just so we're clear there were several separate peer reviewed studies that all came to the same conclusion. The presumption is that all three are wrong?
    Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted. - Emerson

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    1,028

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    This is why scientists repeat studies over and over and over. If one research paper at one location in one year had come to this conclusion then certainly it has lower credibility than one that has been repeated multiple times with the same or similar results. Once you start seeing multiple studies by multiple authors using rigourous methodology, you start taking notice.

    You have to judge each study on its own merit, how it was conducted, were controls used, were as many variables as possible controlled, etc. Science isn't perfect and we must be careful to scrutinize the information that comes out but we must also be careful that we do not outright dismiss findings because the disagre with our own personal biases and beliefs.
    20 hives, 10 years, T and TF, All local stock

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    1,028

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    [QUOTE=Michael Bush;1079559]>Yes, it is a bit of a dilemma to have a peer reviewed scientific study that shows that peer reviewed scientific studies are usually wrong... The study shows the causes and how to predict the likelihood. Some of those things like the length of the study and the scope of the study are very applicable to bee research. I would say anything involving bees that is less 100 hives for less than five years is probably not very accurate.

    Though this is a peer reviewed paper it is also an "essay" and thus somewhat of an opinion piece rather than an actual experiment. If you read some of the comments not everyone in the field agrees with his conclusions.
    20 hives, 10 years, T and TF, All local stock

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Walker, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    1,530

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    hmmm. sounds like they can't prove small cell helps...but they can't prove it hurts either. So it seems to me that it leaves the door wide open for beeks to use whichever method seems to work in their operation. But of course if you take that conclusion from it, then what is left to fight over?

    Sometimes it does seem like the only reason the topic keeps showing up on here is just because folks enjoy fighting over it.

    JMO

    Rusty
    Rusty Hills Farm -- home of AQHA A Rusty Zipper and Rusty's Bees.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN USA
    Posts
    685

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Bah, if you're worried about cell size, just go foundationless and let the bees build whatever size they want.
    Beekeeper since 2013. Read my bee blog at:
    http://harrisonbayhoney.blogspot.com

  15. #14

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked


  16. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    hinesville ga usa
    Posts
    763

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Quote Originally Posted by Edymnion View Post
    Bah, if you're worried about cell size, just go foundationless and let the bees build whatever size they want.
    Exactly my position. Natural cell has worked out better for me than trying to force the bees into what I may think is the best size cell. But each to his own.

  17. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Nehawka, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    53,768

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    >Just so we're clear there were several separate peer reviewed studies that all came to the same conclusion. The presumption is that all three are wrong?

    All short term. All small scale. There are quite a few positive studies on small cell, but you will simply discount them as you have every time they have been brought up before.
    Michael Bush bushfarms.com/bees.htm "Everything works if you let it." ThePracticalBeekeeper.com 42y 40h 39yTF

  18. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Loup City, NE
    Posts
    191

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    Studies,studies,studies???? Smells like someone's making $$$$$$ I like the "Lauri method" 128 hives alive out of
    133. Small cell? Large cell? Don't know. Dang she's a good beek.

  19. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Posts
    1,222

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    MB > "I don't find it to be a problem if you expect it... "

    Having kept bees for almost 30 years I pretty much know how to pry boxes...and your right I do expect to see lots of comb built between the plastic frames. Make no mistake its an issue and a problem at least in my bee management. Its a huge mess and involves lots of extra work cleaning it up unless you want to just set everything back together and squish 100's of bees in the process. I have some pictures I'd be glad to share in case others are not aware of what will happen placing plastic frames on a strong hive. As I understand it you purchased thousands of them so I do understand position.
    "Tradition becomes our security, and when the mind is secure it is in decay".....Krishnamurti

  20. #19

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    I took a look at Keith Delaplane's ABJ article. He says 'I am unaware of any publicly-accessible peer-reviewed papers that support it.'....referring to small cell for varroa control.
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Bush View Post
    All short term. All small scale..........but you will simply discount them as you have every time they have been brought up before.
    If you had a single, long term, large scale, peer reviewed study that supported your contention....my opinion wouldn't get in the way of your posting it....
    Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted. - Emerson

  21. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Great Falls Montana
    Posts
    7,793

    Default Re: Small Cell Claims Debunked

    I run plastic, there is bridge comb like with wood frames I run. I only scrape either wood or plastic infrequently, I own a smoker and know how to make volumes of cool smoke. I don't crush hundreds putting hive back together. Dozens almost certainly are killed every inspection. It is unavoidable. It is not a big deal. I do not feel that plastic is intrinsically evil. All my milk comes in it and I feel fine.

Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •