|
It has been known for some
time that bees perform an intricate dance in directing their
hivemates to a source of food. Now it appears that they also
transmit information by means of sound
by Adrian M. Wenner
[Effect of sound on bees
in a hive]
Can we ever fully understand how the members of another species
communicate with one another? The question has been given a new
implication by the recent proposals that we listen for messages
from the planets of other stars. Whether we ever detect such
messages or not, we can investigate the question here on earth.
We now know of many forms of communication in other species.
None is subtler or more interesting than the "language"
of the honeybee.
It is no accident that Karl von Frisch of the University of Munich
chose the bee for his now famous investigations of animal communication.
A honeybee colony is a marvelously compact community of some
50,000 individuals; it takes care of itself and usually ignores
its human investigator; its members are highly social and could
not survive without constant intercommunication, and the more
one looks into their methods of conversation, the more remarkable
they are found to be.
The obvious features of honeybee communication have been reported
widely and are now a familiar story. When a foraging bee finds
a source of food, it flies back to the hive and conveys to its
fellows the distance and direction of the source. In the course
of doing so it performs on the vertical surface of the comb a
waggling "dance" in which its abdomen traces a figure
eight. The orientation and rate of the dance, it has been supposed,
tells the location of the food source. This hypothesis runs into
an awkward difficulty: the interior of most hives is so dark
that the bees probably cannot see the dance. Investigators of
the phenomenon have found, however, that the bees follow the
dance by means of their antennae, which touch the dancer's body.
Robert C. King of Servomechanisms, Inc., and I, working in my
laboratory at the University of California at Santa Barbara,
looked into the question further. The dancing bee traces the
figure eight with the tip of its abdomen. That is not, however,
the part of the body on which the observing bees usually concentrate
their attention: their antennae tend to rest on the dancer's
thorax. Does the thorax also describe a figure eight during the
dance? We marked foraging bees with a spot of white paint on
the thorax and later photographed its movement during the course
of the dance in the hive by means of a series of rapid-flash
exposures. The pictures showed that the thorax did not describe
a figure-eight pattern [see
illustration].
The dance pattern itself, then, can hardly convey an unequivocal
message. What can? Using a tape recorder, I had discovered that
during the dance the bee emitted a peculiar sound at the low
frequency of 250 cycles per second. This sound was made while
the bee was waggling along in the straight run of its dance.
It suggested a surprising new outlook on the whole problem. Perhaps
the honeybee communicated with its fellows not only by the dance
movement but also by sound signals!
To test this possibility I made tape recordings of the sounds
made by dancing bees after they had visited dishes of sugar syrup
placed at different distances from the hive. Would the sound
patterns show a relation to the distance traveled? In other words,
did the foraging bee tell its hivemates the distance by means
of a sound language?
Analyzed with the sound
spectrograph, the sounds proved to be made up of trains,
each train being further broken into pulses with a frequency
of about 32 per second [see
illustration]. The bee emitted a train of sound during
each straight run of its waggling dance. A careful analysis showed
that the average length of the sound trains during a given dance
(and also the average number of pulses in a train) was directly
proportional to the distance the bee had traveled to the food
source [see
illustration]. The correlation was so good that it seems
altogether likely - certainly as likely as any other proposed
mechanism - that the bee reports the distance by means of this
sound language.
How is the sound produced? The first and most obvious guess was
that the bee might create the pulses of sound with the waggling
of its abdomen. To resolve this question I attached a small piece
of cellophane to a microphone and placed the microphone so that
with each waggle the dancing bee would tap the cellophane. The
sound pulses proved to be about two and a half times more frequent
than the waggling taps, so it became clear that the sound could
not be arising from the waggling. Harald Esch, now at the University
of Munich, who independently had discovered the honeybee's dance
sound at about the same time as I had, also demonstrated that
it was not produced by the waggling. Instead of a cellophane-and-microphone
device, he used the ingenious method of attaching a small magnet
to the bee's abdomen; as the bee moved the magnet it generated
a fluctuating electric voltage that was recorded simultaneously
with the pulsed sound, so that the waggle and pulse rates could
be compared.
The function of the sound train was illuminated by considering
the question of whether or not the bee's judgment of distances
is affected by the wind. Analysis of the sound-train records
showed that it is to some extent. When a bee flies to a source
of food against the wind, the sound trains indicating the distance
tend to be a little longer
than when it does not buck a wind. The deviation from the true
distance is not nearly so much, however as one might expect on
the basis of the wind velocity. A possible explanation is that
the bee adjusts its flying efforts to the wind so that it always
flies at about the same ground speed; thus, whatever the wind
velocity it can still use the elapsed time of travel to a goal
as the measure of its distance. I measured the flight speed of
bees under various wind conditions and found that they do tend
to fly at a constant ground speed. For example, flying against
a wind of five meters per second (about 11 miles per hour) bees
are slowed by only about a fourth of that amount. They minimize
the wind effect by flying closer to the ground. When the wind
is too strong (more than 13 miles per hour), the bees simply
stay in the hive.
We may conclude, then, that the foraging bee's communication
to its fellows in the hive is made up of two elements: the dance and the accompanying sounds. The
angle of the dance from the vertical is correlated with the angle
between the food source and the overhead sun, and the length
of the train of sound during the straight run of the dance tells
the distance. This may not be the whole story, however. Some
current experiments indicate, for instance, a strong correlation
between the rate of pulse production and the strength of the
sugar concentration in a food source. It may conceivably turn
out that the foraging bee's entire message is carried by sound
signals.
[Transmittal of information
by foraging bees]
The sound spectrograph's indication of regularity and precision
in the bee's dance sounds naturally drew attention to other forms
of bee "talk." As everyone knows, the bee is a rather
noisy animal. Even its buzz in flight, however, is not just noise.
The buzz has modulations and variations. When bees begin to swarm,
an experienced beekeeper can detect the event by the sound alone,
even though he may be surrounded by other buzzing bees from hundreds
of hives. When an individual bee is aroused to attack, its buzz
rises in pitch and fluctuates in intensity. And recordings within
the hive show that bees in the hive make at least 10 distinctly
different sounds, some of which have already been related to
specific activities.
Two of these sounds are particularly noticeable. One, known as
the characteristic hum of a beehive, is produced by the "ventilating"
worker bees: bees that stand anchored on the comb or some other
structure in the hive and create currents of air by beating their
wings. This sound, varying in intensity, has a basic frequency
of 250 cycles per second and often has strong overtones. It is
usually much louder than the buzz of a flying bee, undoubtedly
because the sound emitted by the ventilating bee is enhanced
by the resonant vibration of the structure on which it is standing.
The other type of loud sound in the hive is heard when the hive is disturbed. When an intruder
- for example an ant - approaches, the bees guarding the hive
rock forward on their legs and issue a short burst of sound;
they may go on repeating these warning bursts every two or three
seconds for 10 minutes or more. When the hive is jarred, the
collective reaction of hundreds of guarding bees is heard as
a sharp, loud buzz. This is followed shortly by a "piping"
of workers throughout the hive, which consists of faint beeps
at half-second intervals, the sound being a complex one with
a fundamental frequency of 500 cycles per second. The piping
goes on for several minutes. Apparently it serves to soothe the
hive; it has been found that a recording of such piping, played
to the hive, will quickly quiet the disturbed bees.
The most interesting of all the hive sounds, however, is the
piping of the queen. Naturalists have long known that queens
inside the hive emit two kinds of sound, called "tooting"
and "quacking." A close analysis of these sounds and
the circumstances of their emission now provides the strongest
evidence that bees use sound to convey specific messages.
Tooting is the regal identification of a virgin queen soon after
she has emerged from the cell in which she developed. A hive
cannot tolerate more than one queen at a time. In a hive that
lacks a queen several queen-bearing cells develop simultaneously
in a comb, but one matures earlier than the others. Once this
queen has emerged, has hardened and has become steady on her
legs, she proceeds to visit other queen cells, tear them open
and sting to death their potential but not yet mature queens.
Often, however, the worker bees do not allow her to dispose of
all her potential rivals in this way; they bar her from some
of the cells. She then begins to toot and continues to do so
day and night, perhaps for a week or more. Her tooting rises
in intensity and sometimes can be heard more than 10 feet from
the hive.
Meanwhile the maturing queen bees still in cells try to get out
in their turn. The worker bees hold them back, however; as fast
as one of them opens the cap of her cell the workers push it
back in place and glue it shut. Thereupon the imprisoned queens
also start to pipe, but in a different pattern and at a lower
tone than the free queen. The workers let out some of these quackers,
but only one at a time. The reigning queen and the newly released
rival then battle until one is killed. Sometimes the series of
fights between the survivor and the new rivals goes on until
only one queen is left. This survivor, still a virgin, then flies
away from the hive to mate successively with several drones (on
the wing) and returns to begin laying eggs.
All this has been studied in
hives set up for detailed observation. The
tooting and the quacking have also been recorded and analyzed spectrographically. The pattern
of the first turns out to be a long toot (lasting one second)
followed by several shorter toots. Its fundamental frequency
is 500 cycles per second, and this is overlaid with overtones
that are varied considerably in emphasis, just as they are in
human speech [see "Attention and the Perception of Speech,"
by Donald E. Broadbent; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, April, 1962]. The
quack differs from the toot in two ways:
it has a lower fundamental frequency and it begins with short
sounds instead of a drawn-out one.
Do the tooting and the quacking say different things to the bees?
We investigated this question with a set of controlled experiments.
First we recorded the tooting of a free, reigning queen in its
hive. Analysis with the sound spectrograph showed that this tooting
put the major emphasis on the third harmonic. We therefore mimicked
this harmonic with an oscillator and played it in the same tooting
pattern (a long toot followed by several short ones) in a second
hive that contained a free queen and a caged one. To each sounding
of the artificial toots the caged queen almost invariably responded
by quacking [see
illustrations]. We then tried varying the frequency of
the tone, while keeping the long-toot-short-toot pattern constant.
Within a wide frequency range (600 to 2,000 cycles per second)
the change in frequency seemed to make little difference: the
queen still responded with quacks as long as the typical pattern
of toots was the same. On the other hand, when we played the
quacking pattern, the caged queen did not respond at all.
There is not much doubt that the tooting and the quacking represent
certain messages. What do the messages say, and what functions
do they serve? A reasonable working hypothesis is that (1) the
tooting announces the presence of a free queen in the hive, (2)
the quacking reports the presence of challengers ready and yearning
to be freed from their cells and (3) all this information guides
the worker bees. One queen tooting and others quacking means
that there is just one free queen, and a quacker (but not more
than one) may be released to challenge her. This procedure will
result in the rapid killing off of all but one of the contenders,
but that may be to the good; it will enable the hive to settle
down quickly to a peaceful regime. Occasionally, however, particularly
in the spring, a virgin queen or an older egg-laying queen may
leave the hive permanently, taking along half of the adult bees,
in the phenomenon called swarming. In the swarming season, therefore,
it is essential to have a queen in reserve when the free queen
departs; a quacking queen may represent survival for the hive
and is not to be released until the swarm has left.
We must come back now to the
important questions: How does the
bee produce sounds, and how does it perceive them? As to the
production of sound, four hypotheses have been put forward, and
the answer is still not clear.
The most interesting suggestion is that the bee makes its sounds
by ejecting air through its spiracles: the breathing openings
in the side of its body. On purely theoretical grounds it is
quite plausible that the insect could produce the observed sounds
by a whistling or a bagpipe effect. But recent experiments in
our laboratory and also by other investigators generally negate
this theory. For one thing, if helium is substituted for nitrogen
in the air in which the bee produces its sounds, this does not
change the frequency of the sound; if the spiracle theory is
correct, it should, because the density of a gas affects the
frequency of the sound produced by vibrating a column of the
gas. For another thing, it has been found that the sounds of
a piping queen do not always coincide with accordion-like movements
of its abdomen, so that its abdominal spiracles cannot be producing
the sound. Finally, James Simpson of the Rothamsted Experimental
Station in England has shown by delicate spiracle-blocking experiments
that the bee's thoracic spiracles play no part in sound production.
The other possibilities are that the bee produces sound by vibrating
its wings or the sclerites (hard plates) at the base of its wings
or the entire surface of the upper part of its body. Simpson
and I and others have been investigating these possibilities.
At the moment the wing-vibration theory seems to be the most
promising.
Until recently this idea was rejected on two grounds: that a
bee's wings are too small to produce sounds of the frequencies
and intensities heard, and that experimenters who have clipped
the wings have not found that this changed the intensity of the
bee's piping. The second idea is simply wrong; careful experiments
show that clipping the wings does affect the bee's sound-making.
It raises the frequency and reduces the intensity of the sound,
and the change is proportional to the amount of wing removed
[see illustration].
It appears, therefore, that wing vibration is responsible at
least for amplification, and probably for production, of the
bee's sounds. It is hoped that experiments now under way will
answer the question more definitely.
Other recent studies have shed
some light on how bees "hear" sound. In the experiments
in which artificial tooting was played to a caged queen it was
found that the queen responded only when the sound was transmitted
via a vibrator attached to the hive; when it was transmitted
through the air, even with the vibrator suspended close to the
bee, she did not respond at all [see illustration]. Similarly, worker
bees show no reaction to piping when it is airborne. On the other
hand, a disturbed hive can be quickly quieted by drawing a wet
finger along the observation window, which causes a squeaking
sound that arises from vibration of the glass. All these observations
indicate that the bees receive sound through their legs from
the vibrating structure on which they stand. Quite possibly they
have receiving organs for sound on their legs below the knee.
There is also evidence that they receive sound through their
antennae. Eleanor H. Slifer of the University of Iowa has found
that each bee antenna has thousands of "plate organs"
that are remarkably like the larger tympanic (eardrum-like) organs
of other insects. She has established that these plate organs
are not permeable to chemicals that might be used for communication.
Although this finding does not eliminate the possibility that
these organs are chemoreceptors, there is now good reason to
entertain the notion that they do respond to mechanical stimuli.
Charles Walcott of Harvard University has made some experimental
findings that support this view: he discovered that vibrations
transmitted to a bee's antennae caused electrical impulses to
be generated in the antennal nerves.
Conceivably the honeybee receives sound both through its legs
and through its antennae. Thus it may receive a sound communication
from another bee directly by touching the other bee's
body with its antennae - as evidently occurs during the foraging
bee's dance in the hive. The double receiving system would have
a great advantage for bees in a noisy hive: in spite of the din
of piping, which they apparently receive through their legs from
the hive's vibrations, they would still be able to perceive the
faint dance sounds by touching the dancer with their antennae.
Listening to the sounds of bees, recording them, analyzing them
and designing experiments to explore their meaning, one cannot
help feeling that much of this is akin to the problem of communicating
with beings on another planet. With bees we have the advantage
of being able to study them here and now.
The Author
ADRIAN M. WENNER is assistant professor of biology at the University
of California at Santa Barbara. A native of Minnesota, Wenner
received a B.S. in mathematics from Gustavus Adolphus College
in 1951. He also acquired an M.S. in biology from Chico State
College in California in 1955 and a Ph.D. in zoology from the
University of Michigan in 1961. He joined the Santa Barbara faculty
in 1960.
Bibliography
COMMUNICATION AMONG SOCIAL BEES. Martin
Lindauer. Harvard University Press, 1961.
COMMUNICATION WITH QUEEN HONEY BEES
BY SUBSTRATE SOUND. Adrian M.
Wenner in Science, Vol. 138, No. 3538, pages 446-447; October, 1962.
SOUND PRODUCTION DURING THE WAGGLE DANCE OF THE HONEY BEE. A.
M. Wenner in Animal
Behaviour, Vol. 10, No.
1/2, pages 79-95; 1962.
UBER DIE SCHALLERZEUGUNG BEIM WERBETANZ DER HONIGBIENE. Harald
Esch in Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Physiologie, Vol.
45, No. 1, pages 1-11; October, 1961.
|