






 |
by
EDWARD E. SOUTHWICK
Department of Biological Sciences
State University of New York
College at Brockport, New York 14420
BITNET: SOUTHWIK@Brock1P
FAX:716-395-2416
Research Digest - a down-to-earth look at what's going on
in apicultural research. The purpose of this column is to keep
you, the beekeeper, informed of on-going and recent developments
in bee research. Further details may be obtained from the referenced
articles available through interlibrary loan through your local
or state library.
Foraging, Recruitment, and Search
Behavior of Honey Bees
Considerable field
data has been gathered during the past few decades on honey bee
foraging, recruitment, and searching behavior. The dance language
observed and described so well by Karl von Frisch (for which
he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1973) fits nicely with much
of the data. In essence, this theory of recruitment involves
individual foragers indicating their floral resource in the hive
by body movements which can be "read" by other workers
which then go out in the proper direction and the proper distance
to locate the same floral patch. Though this dance language seems
unlikely, it can be observed by anyone in a glass sided observation
hive, and can, in fact, be quantified by setting out feeding
stations of sugar water at defined locations and seeing the resulting
dances. Human observers can readily read the dance of foragers
and determine the foraging area being worked.
There has been for some time, however, an undercurrent of question
about the bee's actual use of this mode of recruitment. No other
insects or even any other groups of animals show such a complex
method of communication. Most social insects utilize chemical
odors, especially in indicating routes to food sources. The best
known of these are the ants which leave an odor trail followed
by other ants to food sources. The chemical odor communication
is common among both social and non-social insects. So are we
certain that such signals are not also used by honey bee foragers?
Actually, even von Frisch recognized the use of odors to some
degree, but his evidence seemed to show an overriding dependence
on the dance language, and he became convinced that the bees
were using this language to communicate food locations. The best
treatment of the possible use of odor in honey bee recruitment
to food resources was recently published in the American Zoologist
and is referenced below (Wenner, et al 1992).
This paper records the early work (as far back as Aristotle around
330 B.C.) up to the present, that newly recruited honey bee workers
rely principly on odor cues as they search for food sources exploited
by hivemates.The early work of many observers (as far back as
Wildman in 1768 and up to date) in the use of dance language
for information transfer to new recruits is also referenced.
There is no disagreement among scientists that returning foragers
dance in the hive. Everyone also agrees that once a forager
locates a good food source, she will be able to fly directly
to and from that flower patch. That is, she flies a straight
line (a bee-line) to the food patch from the hive using local
landmarks and the sun for orientation. The disagreement comes
in answering the question of just how the recruits find the flower
patch being exploited by the successful forager. By noting the
times it takes for foragers to fly directly, it is easily seen
that recruits seem to take too long a time for a straight-line
flight. If they read the direction and distance from the forager's
dance, then why cannot they too fly directly, or nearly so, to
the flower patch? Of course, they might be a little off in their
direction, but then when they get close to the patch they should
recognize the fragrance of the flowers which were present on
the forager bee whose dance they followed back in the hive, and
be able to quickly zero-in on the patch. If, on the other hand,
the recruits are merely excited by the forager dance and then
go out in search of the patch, they would be expected to take
a much longer time to find the patch, but again when they perceive
the same flower fragrance carried by the dancing forager back
in the hive, they should be able to locate the patch and from
then on fly directly to and from it.
Wenner and his colleagues at the University of California at
Santa Barbara, use their own collected data along with considerable
data collected by other investigators, including von Frisch and
others promoting the dance langnage hypothesis, to show that
recruits do indeed take too long to find the flower source for
a direct flight. In fact, often recruits end up at test feeding
stations in the opposite direction of the station from which
the succesful forager was feeding. By looking at the numbers
of recruits that actually come to the feeding station from
which the foragers came and the numbers of bees that were in
contact with the dancer that ended up at other feeding stations,
one wonders why more recruits do not go to the "correct"
food patch. In one study discussed in the referenced paper, when
a feeding station with which bees were familiar was moved to
a new site some distance away, some foragers eventually found
this new site and when they returned to the hive they danced.
But only 14 of the 70 bees attending the dances of the foragers
actually came to the correct location. Twenty other bees attending
the dances left the hive but did not arrive at the feeder. The
other 36 former foragers that were watched did not contact the
dancers. Of the 14 recruits that found the feeding station, 10
required repeated contacts with the dancers between as many as
nine exploratory flights before they finally located the station.
The four recruits that located the patch on the first flight
had search times two to six times longer than the 30 second bee-line
required of the experienced foragers. |

| Figure 1.
Flight time for honey
bee foragers recruited to a feeding station indicated by the
waggle dance of successful foragers back in the hive. The normal
outgoing flight time for an experienced forager was less than
20 seconds (note the time scale on the figure is in minutes). |
|
| In other experiments
examined, search times for recruited bees were even more at variance
with the recruits having any knowledge of direction or distance
from dancing foragers. In one case (Figure 1), outgoing flight
times between the colony and the food patch for experienced foragers
was under 20 seconds, yet recruited bees searched a median time
of 8 minutes (and as long as 75 minutes) before they found the
station indicated by the dance. Also, other data show that search
times downwind are less than those upwind. |

| Figure 2.
Possible flight pathway
of a recruited forager in the hive. The experienced forager flies
directly back and forth between the hive and food source. The
recruit flies out from the hive in expanding circles until it
encounters the plume of odor molecules emanating from the food
source that match the odors on the dancing bee. Then the recruit
flies upwind into ever increasing concentration of the odor until
it reaches the food source. After learning the food source location
(and the location of the hive) the recruit can also fly the bee-line. |
|
These interpretations
lend credance to the authors' suggestion that honey bees are
likely to utilize odors more in finding flower patches than they
do the dance language (which may only serve as a stimulus to
go out and search). Their odor-search hypothesis involves recruited
bees leaving the colony and flying in ever-expanding spirals
until they perceive odor molecules similar to those present on
the body of the returned forager back in the hive (Figure 2).
When they encounter the odor, they begin a zig-zag pattern of
flight moving toward the increasing concentration of odor molecules
(kind of similar to a person moving toward a neighbor's barbecue
at dinner time). Should the bees stray from the odor plume, they
immediately reverse their direction to get back into the plume
(casting area in the figure). In this way they can zero-in
on the food source. Once they find the food source, if it is
within the range of the hive with which they are familiar, the
recruits can find their way more directly back to the hive using
known landmarks (experienced forager flight in the figure).
One of the attractive features of the odor hypothesis in honey
bees is the very wide use of odors by so many other social insects.
The description for bees sounds remarkably similar to the chemical
odor trail marking used in the foraging pattern of many insects
and especially well described for leafcutter ants by Edward 0.
Wilson in his book entitled Biophilia (see description
in Books & Media in this issue). Wilson's description is
so well done it takes you down to the level of the ant, a few
millimeters above the ground surface, scurrying along a scent
trail to and from a food source and the nest. The ant, too, follows
a zig-zag pattern along the trail as it moves into and out of
the center of the odor cloud.
More research effort is needed in the area of honey bee foraging,
recruit flight and orientation of bees in the field.
Reference:
Wenner, A.M., D.E. Meade, L.J. Friesen. 1992. Recruitment,
search behavior, and flight ranges of honey bees. Am. Zoologist
31:768-782. |
|