






 |
By Joe Traynor
Most people think of farmers as a homogeneous lot - hard working
individuals that make a living off the land and that are, by
nature,
distrustful of city folk. This is the image portrayed by the
media and it generally holds true, although with one notable
exception: the Napa Valley grape grower.
The gentrification of the Napa Valley over the past 20 years
has created a class of grape growers that is as different from
your average farmer as grapes are from grape shot. If an outsider
were to base his or her impression of all grape growers solely
on a visit to the Napa Valley, that impression would be wrong.
Over the past 20 years, the Napa Valley has seen an influx of
"city folk"
that have earned their money in a number of fields, including
entertainment, law and technology. They have transferred their
talents from their chosen fields to fields of grapes, partly
because of the desire for a new challenge and partly because
of the life style. The results have been the yuppification (which
is not necessarily a pejorative term) of the Napa Valley as these
new vineyardists have melded their life style with those of long-time
Napa Valley vintners.
Old-time Napa valley growers have been confronted with an identity
crisis: Am I a farmer or a gentleman farmer? Those that can afford
it have resolved this crisis by taking on the role of gentleman
farmer while assigning the role of plain "farmer" to
a capable manager who handles the nuts and bolts of the farming
operation. Those that know they will always be "just"
a farmer shake their heads at the current situation and get on
with their daily work, although with increased isolation from
a changed community.
A World Away in the San Joaquin
Valley
The San Joaquin Valley
grape grower fits nicely into the conventional image of the farmer.
He is free from the outside influences that have changed the
Napa Valley and he therefore has no identity crisis. He has no
need to keep up with his neighbors because his neighbors are
just like him: hard working and focused on the day-to-day tasks
of extracting a living from the vineyard.
The San Joaquin Valley wine grape grower has somewhat of an inferiority
complex because the price he is paid for his crop is significantly
less than what the Napa Valley grower receives. In America, the
amount of money one makes is used by many to judge the worth
of an individual with higher status and more respect often accorded
to those with the most money. In the winegrape industry, the
price received per ton of grapes is a status symbol.
San Joaquin Valley growers realizes that Napa Valley's climate
- mainly with its cool nights - produces a superior product,
but they feel that the disparity in the price received for that
product is far wider than the disparity in quality. This price
disparity is particularly galling when San Joaquin Valley growers
consider that wines with the Napa Valley appellation are allowed
to contain up to 25 percent of wine from other areas, usually
from the San Joaquin Valley area.
What the San Joaquin Valley vintner lacks in quality, he makes
up for in quantity. Per-acre yields are significantly higher
in the San Joaquin Valley coupled with lower overhead costs -
including land prices in the San Joaquin Valley at approximately
$3000 per acre compared to $25,000 per acre and beyond in the
Napa Valley. Add to this the lower costs needed to maintain the
San Joaquin Valley grower's lifestyle and the San Joaquin Valley
grower is probably better off than his Napa Valley counterpart.
Joe Traynor is a certified professional soil scientist, crop
scientist and agronomist listed with the American Registry of
Certified Professionals in Agronomy, Crops and Soils, Ltd. He
holds multiple degrees from the University of California, Davis,
is a member of the American Society for Horticultural Science,
and is the author of Ideas in Soil and Plant Nutrition, published
by Kovak Books.
|
Traynor's "Different
Valleys, Different Worlds" Comparison Chart |
| |
NAPA VALLEY |
S.J. VALLEY |
| Daily
dress |
Designer jeans |
Levis |
| Formal
wear |
Tuxedo |
Clean Levis |
| Boots |
Tony Lama |
Red Wings |
| Favorite
beverage |
Dry Martini (when
no one's looking) |
Beer (anytime,
with anybody) |
| Favorite
saying |
"Friends don't
let friends drink White
Zinfandel" |
"If it ain't there,
It ain't there" |
| Favorite
magazine |
GQ |
Field & Stream |
| Favorite
quartet |
Kronos |
Statler Brothers |
| Favorite
contemporary singer |
Joni Mitchell |
Johnny Cash |
| Favorite
singer from the
past |
Edith Piaf |
Hank Williams |
| Usually
votes |
Republican (but apologizes to Bay Area friends) |
Republican
(and proud of it) |
| Favorite sport |
Tennis |
Football |
| Language skills |
French |
Spanish |
| Radio is tuned
to |
Classical Music |
Rush Limbaugh |
| Recent event
enjoyed |
Four course dinner
w/fellow vintners |
Deep pit barbecue
w/fellow growers |
| What
growers came away
with from this event |
The Euro-dollar will
have a big impact on the sales of French wines |
Stanford and Cal
don't have the guts to schedule
the Bulldogs |
| Where
you can find growers
on saturday |
On the tennis court
or on the golf course |
In the vineyard
or in the shop |
| Favorite
topic |
Why Napa Valley
wines are vastly superior to San
Joaquin Valley wines |
Why we don't get
paid more for our grapes when
many of them end up in Napa Valley bottles |
| Most
frequently used
word(s) |
"Eclectic" |
"Horsepucky" |
| Recurring
pleasant dream |
The 1976 blind taste test |
The last day
of harvest |
| Recurring
nightmare |
Washington wines
win blind taste test |
Spring frost
and rain during harvest |
| All time favorite
movie |
Jules and Jim |
High Noon |
| Favorite restraunt |
The French Laundry |
Local steak house |
| Favorite TV
show |
King of the Hill |
King of the Hill |
|
|