|
by ERIK OSTERLUND
Sweden
honeybee@elgon.se
The small cell theory for varroa control
Two years ago I
was totally unaware of any difference in the sizes of the cells
in the bee colony, other than the difference between a worker
cell and a drone cell (and, of course, the queen cell). I thought
the foundation manufacturers gave us beekeepers what was natural
and best for the bees; what the bees would choose, themselves.
It was self evident in my thought, if I ever thought about it.
I had totally forgotten I had published a small article on cell
sizes about ten years ago in the Swedish bee journal Bitidningen
(Nov 1990) (I'm editor of that journal). At that time there
had been some experiments in Germany with big cell sizes, or
rather cells with enlarged cell bottoms. Today you don't hear
anything about these. On the contrary, you do hear a lot about
small cell sizes.
For more than 10 years I've been involved in trying to breed
tolerance for the varroa mite into the our honey bee. Soon enough,
I was aware of the seemingly higher tolerance in bees with African
origin, in Brazil especially at that time. I got a strong gut
feeling that African bees might have something in common, making
it easier for them to deal with the varroa mite. And fate or
God's providence or whatever you would like to call it, I prefer
the latter, made it possible for me to participate in bringing
breeding material of an easily handled and hardy African mountain
bee to Sweden (eggs and semen)(1).
Like others in the field, I concentrated on the rate of the increase
in number of mites in the bee colony. Soon I realized that this
was a dead end. In these tests being done during just one season,
the colony never reached the amount of mites where it leveled
out and you got a "normal" amount of mites. You never
got an idea of how the bees could handle a situation with a high
level of mites, how they could stand the secondary infections
and whether they would get rid of mites themselves, in any way.
Especially through the experiences of Poul-Erik Karlsen on Bornholm(2), I also became aware of the two sides of treatment
with acaricides against the mite. Besides killing mites they
have unwanted effects. In this case, creating a reduction of
the bees' own fighting ability against the mite, and a reduction
in their tolerance to secondary infections, thus reducing what
we call varroa tolerance.
Ed and Dee Lusby
Less then two years ago I became aware of Ed and Dee Lusby in
Arizona and their stubborn defense of the very strong importance
of a small cell size in connection with tolerance to the varroa
mite, as well as the tracheal mite and secondary infections.
Yes, the health of the bee, to put it simply. No, I couldn't
believe the solution was so simple. And, a difference of some
fractions of millimeters couldn't have such an impact. And, what
they were talking about must be significantly smaller than what
was natural to our bees.
But, I have never trusted authorities right away. People repeat
a lot of what others say, and when you have heard it enough times,
you recognize it and therefore regard it a truth. And what always
has haunted me, since I was very young, is a statement by Albert
Einstein. He said that if you want to make progress in science
and community, you have to dare to question what is generally
accepted and search yourself for the facts that will form the
foundation for your thoughts.
So, in spite of my first negative feelings about small cell size,
I knew I had to dare to find out a little more about the issue,
though I thought I was on the right track with just breeding
tolerance. I started emailing Dee Lusby in Tucson, Arizona, and
got overhelmed with information. I dug through it and had to
admit she had found out a lot of things about what was natural
to the bees. And she and her husband, Ed, had a lot of experience
to back up what they were saying.
They have a totally organic approach to beekeeping. To the contrary
of what many may seem to think, they are not fanatics about small
cell size in the sense that it should be the only and sole solution
to every problem related to bees. They say cell size is 1/3 of
the answer, 1/3 is breeding and 1/3 is environment, where they
especially stress natural food for the bees - honey and pollen,
and only that, for emergency feeding when necessary. Are they
right? Well, they can't be totally wrong because they haven't
been using any kind of beekeeping medication for many, many years.
They had gone from 1000 colonies to 104, but now they are up
at 700 and steadily increasing. At the end of 2001 they count
on 800, and in 2002 they plan to sell nucs on frames with the
cell size of 4.9 mm.
Natural selection
Natural selection has two criteria: survival and reproduction.
And they are both dependent on a) the environment and b)
the gene pool of the population.
Natural honey bee selection has been underway for a longer time
than man's selection process. Natural selection is able to recognize
every kind of trait and every kind of variation and its influence
on survival and reproduction in the environment, where the population
is living. Man is just a beginner at this science.
The issue of bee size
Man wants to interfere wherever he can and most often he
thinks he knows best. And since the days when wax foundation
first was made, man has manipulated the size of the cells in
the beehive. And since breeding queens began, man has preferred
big queens and big bees. Bigger bees had longer tongues and bigger
honey sacs (but fewer flying abilities due to aerodynamics).
The most popular bee most of these years has been the Italian
bee. It has been bred yellower and bigger, and from being probably
the smallest European bee(3),
today it is the biggest in many places, if not most. For good
or for bad? - probably for bad.
The size of the bee
The size of the bee is dependent on a) the heritage and
b) the size of the cell it's born in. This later is connected
also to how the larvae is fed by the nurse bees. Photo 1 illustrates
how genetics for smaller bees and smaller cells give bigger bees
in bigger artificial cells, but all genetics seem not to be affected
alike by the cell size.
The size of the cell
The size of the cell is dependent on a) the size of the
bee, and b) its heritage.
At the end of the 19th century Cowan, editor of the British
Bee Journal, measured natural worker cell size to be between
4.72 (0.186 inch) and 5.36 mm (0.211 inch)(4).
The effects on the area of the cell itself and on the number
of cells in a brood box can be quite considerable for different
cell sizes. We can also see that worker bee size and worker cell
size has an effect on drone cell size and, thus, also on drone
size. And, the size of the drone has an effect on its flying
and competing abilities. Smaller is better! See Table 1.
| Table
1. |
 |
The least confusing way of measuring cell size is to measure
10 cells in a row from midwall to midwall (including thus one
cell wall for each cell) and divide by ten, measuring over the
parallel sides (see Photo 2).
 |
But, when measuring commercial
wax foundation, one direction of measuring (often along the top
portion) will give higher value due to a stretching factor when
milling. Therefore, measuring all three ways that are possible
is a preferred method (Photo 3). According to Lusby, to be able
to regulate varroa mites, the size should never exceed 4.9 mm
in any direction.
Though born in 5.5 mm, I have measured my bees to build naturally
4.95-5.5 mm as the smallest size. You also see that the bees
build cells intended for brood smaller than cells intended for
honey storage. It can vary quite a lot. Then, it's important
to recognize what type of cells you are measuring when you measure
naturally built comb. When my bees in coming seasons will be
born in smaller cells than 5.5mm. they will also build still
smaller naturally if given the opportunity. This was already
discovered by the greatest enlargement prophet himself, Usmar
Baudoux, at the beginning of the 20th century.(5) Where this downsizing will end is, of course,
set by the genetics, but also by environment. The Lusbys have
pointed out that, as is the case in other animals, size and color
will naturally vary due to height above sea level and distance
from the equator.(6)
I
couldn't resist buying a handmill from Tom Industries in California
(now Arizona) to be able to find out myself how small cell size
would affect my bees. The season of 2000 I tested about 70 of
my 100 colonies and gave them foundation for 4.8 mm cell size.
(As I milled with a thin plastic wrapping of the wax sheets,
I got no stretching that the mill was "prepared" for.
Therefore, I got 4.8 mm cell size instead of 4.9 mm.) One of
the colonies drew the foundation surprisingly well (Photo 4). |
Five
colonies drew out the foundation well enough, while 10 did it
satisfactorily. Some were wintered on entirely 4.8 mm cell size
2000-2001 (Photo 5.) I was amazed how small the bees were in
these colonies! The small cell size had a larger impact than
I thought on bee size, especially the abdomen. But this did not
hinder the colonies from wintering, even better than their larger
close relatives. I live at the latitude of 59º in Sweden.
But, the warm Gulf stream in the Atlantic gives us a fairly good
climate here in Scandinavia. Well, in the season of 2001 I will
discover if these small bees can produce any honey: Probably
they will, as the small size of the Africanized bees in Brazil
has not hindered them from collecting a lot more honey than the
previous European type. |
Ten
of my colonies in 2000 couldn't draw 4.8-foundation at all, which
resulted in awful combs that I melted down (Photo 6). Most colonies
can't return immediately to small cell size due to the current
bees being too large, which results from enlarged cell sizes
and genetically selected large bees. You have to downsize your
cell and honey bee size more slowly. You can read about how to
do it on the website beesource.com.(7) |
Non-European Mellifera
Honey bees from outside Europe have not been under selection
for larger size and are normally not kept with enlarged wax foundation,
even if they, no doubt, could be kept that way, too. It is noticable
that where European rnellifera are kept on enlarged cells
is where we have the major problems with mites and secondary
infections. Could this be a part of the explanation? (Table 2).
| Table
2. |
 |
Natural selection concerning
cell size and size of the bee
All flying objects,
manmade or natural-made, have to deal with the aerodynamic laws
dependent on gravity and air friction. Air friction is subject
to body area. Gravity is subject to body weight.
When you increase an object proportionally, the area increases
by the factor of four and the weight by the factor of eight.
That's why a bomber is slower than a fighter, and a bumblebee
is "clumsier" and slower than a honey bee. That's why
big bees and big drones are slower and "clumsier" than
small bees and small drones. Quicker and better flyers, of course,
have a better chance to reach the virgin queens first. It's not
difficult to visualize small drones hitting first. So natural
selection most probably goes for small. And the size of drones
and workers are correlated. Could that be an explanation
of why Africanized drones most often reach the virgins first
in Africanized areas?
In nature no one is giving the colonies new comb. The colonies
use their old brood comb year after year, with cocoons making
them smaller each year, thus making the bees born in them smaller.
This, causes those bees to have smaller cell size. Natural selection
thus selects for small - small bees and small cell size, at least,
smaller cells than we use on our enlarged wax foundation. This
fact pushes us to investigate what kind of effects these smaller,
more natural cell size and bee size will have on the performance
of the honey bee colony.
You may ask if all those large-cell sized combs that have been
in the hive for many years haven't been reduced sufficiently
already? Well, maybe, but as the distance between the combs is
much bigger than what the bees would choose (35-38 mm instead
of 32-33 mm), most of the cocoons probably end up at the bottom
of the cells, so it will take some years to get the cells small
enough that way. And, these old frames don't give the bees a
smaller brood nest that will be easier to keep the brood temperature
at the higher 35ºC, instead of the lower 33ºC, which
can occur in the outer frames of the broodnest. It is this lower
temperature that gives the optimum environment for mite reproduction.(8)
A bee business with varroa, but without any type of chemical
Dee
and Ed Lusby in southern Arizona have never used any type of
chemical to fight any type of mite. This caused their bee business
to crash more than once when the mites arrived, first tracheal
mites and then varroa mites. From having 1000 colonies in 1986,
they went down to about 400 colonies in 1989 and started up again,
after having changed over to 5.0-5.1 mm cell size when the tracheal
mite hit. When varroa hit in 1993, they were up over 900 again,
but fell down to 104 colonies in the spring of 1998. They started
to give their colonies 4.8-4.9 foundation in 1997. They say 4.9
mm cell size is crucial and is the main reason why they now are
back in business and increasing their number of hives and honey
crops (Photo 7), while many others using chemicals are going
the other way. |
My wife, daughter and I visited
the Lusbys in April-May 2000. I "fled" from my 50th
birthday to Arizona from Sweden. That was a good choice. Lovely
people and an interesting country you have over there. I received
my cowboy hat and belt, though I'm not really worthy of them.
I looked in 225 hives in 13 apiaries and encountered a couple
of colonies that resembled the descriptions of so-called killer
bees. Lusbys bred for small bees and a short cappings period
of the brood for many years before the Africanized (AHB) bees
arrived in the area. Their drones probably compete well with
the Africanized drones. Very important, too, seems to be the
observation by them that mixed colored bees, which the Africanized
honey bee is said to be, don't have drones as early and as late
as black bees. So, they let their virgins mate early and late
in the season. And, they go for small black bees.

Another interesting observation of theirs concerning cell size
and bee size is that swarms they collect that can't adapt to
4.9 (thrive and draw 4.9 after two months, two generations of
bees), even after being forced down through already drawn 4.9
comb, will all die due to the mites and secondary infections.
(They seem to be too big genetically. Maybe this has been caused
through man's selection?) One of the characteristics of these
larger bees genetically is that they are on the lighter colored
side.
Where can you purchase small-cell sized foundation (4.9 mm)?
You can buy your 4.9-foundation from Dadant and Sons, Inc.(9), if you don't want to mill your own with a
mill from Tom Industries.
Footnotes
1) Osterlund, Erik, 1991, Exploring Monticola - Efforts to find
an Acceptable Varroa Resistant Honey Bee. Am. Bee J. 131:49-56.
2) Osterlund, Erik, 2001, The Elgon Bee and Varroa mites, Am.
Bee J., 141:174-177
3) Erslev, Hans, 1950, Forer i Biavl, Forers i biavls forlag,
Rosklide, Denmark. A new edition of the original from 1887, which
in its turn is a translation of an English original by Cowan,
Thos. Wm.
4) Cowan, Thos. Wm, The Honey-bee; its Natural History, Anatomy,
and
Physiology, page 180. Referred to in Gleanings of Bee
Culture, April 1898,
p. 261.
5) Baudoux, U.,1933, The influence of cell size. The
Bee World, vol XIV, no 4, April, page 40. Baudoux, U., 1961,
Handboek van de imker door, Edm. Leysen, pp 13-19 (in
Flemish language).
6) http://www.beesource.com/pov/lusby/therm_map.htm
7) http://beesource.com/eob/4dot9/index.htm
8) Velthuis, Hayo H W, Kraus, Bernhard,
2000. The Impact
of Humidity and Temperature Gradients in the Brood Nest of Honeybees
on the Reproduction of Varroa jacobsoni: Laboratory Observations,
Second International Conference on Africanized Honey Bees
and Bee Mites, 10-12 April 2000, Tucson.
Velthuis, Hayo H W, Kraus, Bernhard, 2000. The Impact
of Humidity and Temperature Gradients in the Brood Nest of Honeybees
on the Reproduction of Varroa jacobsoni: Field Experiments,
Second International Conference on Africanized Honey Bees
and Bee Mites, 10-12 April 2000, Tucson.
9) http://www.beesource.com/dadant/index.htm
|