|
by JEAN-DANIEL CHARRIERE
and ANTON IMDORF
Swiss Federal Dairy Research Station
(FAM)
Bee Department, Liebefeld
3003 Bern, Switzerland
Translation by Ro. Raynor
The following moths are regarded as pests of bee products:
Class: Insects - Insecta
Order: Butterflies - Lepidoptera
Family: Pyralids - Pyralidae
Species:
Greater Wax Moth - Galleria mellonella L.
Lesser Wax Moth - Achroia grisella
Fruit (pollen) Moth - Vitula edmansae
Mediterranean Flour Moth - Esphestia kuehniella
Of all moths, the Greater Wax Moth causes the greatest damage
in apiaries which lead to material and financial losses every
year. For this reason, we propose to study only the biology of
the Greater Wax Moth more closely. The methods employed in combating
Galleria mellonella are generally effective against other moths
identified as pests of bee products.
Biology of the Greater Wax
Moth
a) Geographical distribution
The geographical distribution
corresponds reasonably with that of the bee. Distribution is
limited by the inability of the pest to withstand prolonged periods
of cold. This explains why Wax Moth problems are less acute in
higher altitude locations or do not occur at all [1].
b) Pathology
Adult Wax Moths cause no damage because their mouthparts
are atrophied. They do not feed during their adult life. Only
larvae feed and destroy combs. However, adult Wax Moths and larvae
can transfer pathogens of serious bee diseases (e.g. foulbrood).
In colonies infested with foulbrood. the feces of Wax Moths contain
large amounts of Paenibacillus larvae spores [2].
c) Development stages
Galleria development goes through 3 consecutive
stages--egg, larva and pupa. This sequence is only interrupted
if the temperature is too low or when there is no food. Therefore,
the cycle can last between 6 weeks and 6 months depending on
temperature and food. According to the literature, over-wintering
can take place as egg, larva or pupa.
d) The egg
Normally, females lay their eggs by means of their ovipositor
into crevasses and gaps. This puts them out of reach of the bees
and prevents their destruction.
e) The larva
After hatching, the
young larva immediately searches for a comb in order to feed
and to build the silk-lined feeding tunnels. Speed of growth
is directly dependent on temperature and food supply. Under ideal
conditions the larval weight can double daily during the first
10 days [4]. The metabolic warmth, which is created by this rapid
growth, can increase the temperature in the spun silk nests far
beyond the environmental temperature. The larva feed in particular
on impurities occurring in wax, such as feces and the cocoons
of bee larvae as well as pollen. The larva also eat wax. Larvae,
which have been reared exclusively on pure wax (foundation, fresh
comb), do not complete their development [4; 13]. Dark, old combs
that contain many bee larval cocoons are most at risk. At the
end of the larval stage, the larva spins a very resistant silk
cocoon on a firm support, such as wooden frames, hive walls or
in the comb storage chest. Frequently the larva spins its cocoon
in a hollow it had bored into the wood.
f) The pupa
In the cocoon, the larva changes into a pupa and then into
the adult moth. These metamorphoses last from one to 9 weeks.
g) The adult Insect (imago)
Size and color of the imago vary considerably, depending
on food composition at the larval stage and on the duration of
the various developmental stages. Females are larger than males
[5]. The females start laying eggs between day 4 and 10 after
emergence from the cocoon [5]. At dusk, the females attempt
to enter the beehive to lay their eggs. If the colony is strong
enough to repel the wax moth, they lay their eggs outside in
cracks in the wood.

Possibilities for controlling
Wax Moth
In beehives:
-Allow only strong colonies in an apiary. (The bee itself is
the most dangerous enemy of the Wax Moth).
-Never leave comb or wax in an unoccupied hive.
-Periodically clean your Varroa inserts.
-Replace combs regularly.
-After mass invasion of Wax Moths, destroy their eggs on combs,
frames and hives (e.g. sulphur vapor).
In comb storage chests:
(see table)
Main rule: For all control
strategies, it is necessary to inspect stored material regularly
during the warm season.
oTechnical methods
oPhysical methods
oBiological methods
-Bacillus thuringiensis
spores
The bacterium Bacillus
thuringiensis was discovered in 1911 and has been successfully
used for plant protection for several years. The bacterial strain
of the product B-401 was selected in particular for its activity
against the Wax Moth. The bacterium produces spores containing
a toxin. When the larvae ingest the spores, the toxin is freed
and damages the intestinal walls. This results in the death of
the larvae. Adult Wax Moths do not feed and are therefore not
endangered by this product. B-401 is harmless for vertebrates
(man, livestock) and bees, and leaves no residues in wax or honey.
(It is not currently available for sale to U.S. beekeepers.)
oChemical methods
-Sulphur (sulphur dioxide, SO2)
Burning of sulphur strips or spraying of SO2 from a
pressurized vessel are the two main control methods using sulphur.
This is still one of the most effective means against Wax Moths.
It is highly volatile, not fat-soluble and therefore poses only
a slight danger to bees, wax, and honey. After removing comb
from the colonies, it is advisable to wait one or two weeks before
treatment (SO2 is ineffective against eggs). For
more safety, the treatment can be repeated after 2 weeks.
-Acetic acid
Acetic acid vapor instantly kills eggs and moths. The larva,
especially in the cocoon, is more resistant and must be exposed
to the vapors for longer [3]. For this reason, the combs must
be treated immediately after removal from the colonies, before
eggs can develop into larvae.
-Formic acid
Professional beekeepers in Europe successfully use formic
acid against Wax Moths. The effects are comparable to that of
acetic acid.
-Paradichiorobeuzene (PDCB)
In high concentrations, PDCB can be toxic to bees. If several
combs are put directly into the colony from a storage chest without
airing, heavy damage may occur and can result in the death of
the colony.
| Control Possibilities Against Wax Moths In Stored
Combs |
| Method |
Advantages
(+)
Disadvantages (-) |
Procedure/Remarks |
| Technical |
|
+
no residues |
|
| - |
-
Sorting comb |
|
- supplementary
measure
- separate dangerous old comb from foundation and new comb |
| - immediately
melt old wax |
|
-
supplementary measure |
| -
storage in a cool, light, and airy place |
+
simple |
- Moths
fear light and drafts; e.g. shed, porch;
- Protect against weather, rodents and insects |
| Physical |
|
+
no residues |
|
| |
-
cool storage (<15ºC) |
+
effective
- infrastructure, long term method |
-
cellar, cool place
- good air circulation in comb stack |
| -
frost treatment |
+
effective
+ kills all stages
- expensive infrastructure |
-
2 hours at -15ºC or 3 hours at -12C or 4.5 hours at -7ºC
[5]
- strict period of frost |
| -
heat treatment |
+
effective
+ kills all stages
- infastructure (warm air blower)
- risk of wax melting |
-
80 minutes at 46ºC or 40 minutes at 49ºC
- good air circulation
- accurate temperature control |
| Biological |
-
spores of Bacillus thuringiensis (B-401) |
+
no residues
+ long-term effect (2-3 months)
- average effect against the Lesser wax moth
- expensive |
-
observe instructions
- ensure good distribution on the combs
- observe sell-by-date and storage conditions (living organisms)
- if combs already infested, 1 x sulphur, then B-401
- ideal for the beekeeper with a few colonies |
| Chemical |
-
Sulphur |
+
effective
+ good pollen consevation against molds
- regular repeats
- ineffective against eggs
- fire danger |
-
treatment from above (SO2 heavier than air)
- do not breath in vapors (respiratory and eye irritant)
- burn in a small sulphur stove
- treat every four weeks (in summer)
- 1 strip per 100 liters (about 3 supers)
- SO2 in spray can
- 1 second (=2.5g SO2) per honey super or
- 3-4 seconds per 100 liters hive volume
- no fire danger |
| -
Acetic Acid |
+
effective
+ no problem residues
+ kills all stages
+ kills Nosema spores [10]
- attacks metal parts
- regular repeats
- caution when handling |
-
treatment from above (vapors heavier than air)
- do not breath in vapors, avoid contact with skin
- 200ml acetic acid (60-80%) per 100 liters per hive volume [6;7;10;11]
- in summer, treatment repeated 1-2 times with an interval of
2 weeks |
| -
Formic Acid |
+
effective
+ no problem residues
+ kills all stages
- attacks metal parts
- regular repeats
- caution when handling |
-
treatment from above
- do not breath in vapors, avoid contact with skin
- 80ml formic acid (85%) per 100 liters hive volume [12]
- in summer, treatment repeated 1-2 times with an interval of
2 weeks |
-
Paradich-
lorobenzine
(PDCB) |
+
simple handling
+ effective
- residues in wax and honey!!!
- ineffective against eggs
- toxic to bees at high dosages |
-
use cannot be recommended
- aerate combs for 2-3 days before inserting into colony
- treatment from above |
Contamination of wax and honey by paradichiorobenzene
(PDCB)
PDCB is a highly volatile
and lipophilic (easily soluble in fat and wax) substance. Beeswax
can take up this material and a part of it may later migrate
into honey. Honey analyses from Germany and Austria show that
PDCB residues in honey are not rare. This applies to native as
well as imported honeys.
Even when measured values pose no problems as far as human toxicology
is concerned (an experiment on carcinogenic effects is ongoing),
the reputation of honey as one of the last natural products may
be damaged in the eyes of the public. Therefore, all beekeepers
who are concerned about the quality of bee products are advised
not to use PDCB and it is recommended that alternative control
strategies be employed.
German experiments (K. Wallner, Hohenheim, 1992) [8]
-PDCB - Residues in honey
109 analyzed German honey samples
51 honeys tainted with PDCB |
| ug/kg |
Samples |
| 3-5 |
29 |
| 6-10 |
16 |
| 11-20 |
3 |
| 21-50 |
3 |
| >50 |
0 |
(limit of detection at 3 micrograms
per kilogram honey)
1 ug/kg corresponds with 1 millionth of a gram in 1 kilogram
honey.
-Paradichlorobenzene in wax
The amount of PDCB stored in wax depends on the duration
of exposure and the wax surface area. Foundation takes up PDCB
more quickly than wax as a block (table 1). Wax takes up PDCB
like a sponge. The more PDCB crystals are added to combs and
the longer PDCB acts on the combs, the higher the substance stored
in the wax.
Table 1: Uptake capacity of a 1kg wax block
| Time Span |
Paradichlorobenzene |
| After
1 Month |
27.3g |
| After
2.5 Months |
38.5g |
| After
9 Months |
83.5g |
Evaporation of PDCB from beeswax.
-Airing
Airing of combs over 1-2 days before insertion into the colony
avoids visible damage to bees. Despite this, considerable amounts
of PDCB may still be present in wax. Airing over several weeks
is not enough to remove PDCB from wax completely (fig.2).


The amount and speed of removal are above all temperature-dependent.
Thus, the considerably higher temperature in the colony causes
PDCB evaporation from combs not previously aired enough. If these
cells are now filled with honey, PDCB migrates slowly into the
honey.
-Melting old wax
When old comb is melted, the residues persist in the new
wax. Examinations of wax carried out here have shown that the
majority of commercial wax in Switzerland contains PDCB residues
of 5-10 mg/kg.
Stability of PDCB In honey
-PDCB evaporates reluctantly
from honey and only from the topmost layer.
-Honey cannot be aired as long as needed, since it attracts water
and odors.
-There is no possibility of significantly reducing paradichlorobenzene
content of honey later.
-Residues of PDCB in honey are not permitted in Switzerland.
Honeys with residues are rejected by the Cantonal chemists. Honeys
with any residue that is not normal will be rejected by British
packers.
Bibliography:
[1]Jeanne F., 1982, Principaux papillons parasites de la
cire et moyens de lutte. Bul. tech. apic.,9(2), 85 - 92 [Principal
moth parasites in wax and means of control.]
[2]Borchert A., 1966, Die Krankheiten und Schadlinge der
Honigbiene. Hirzel Verlag Leipzig [Diseases and pests of the
honey bee]
[3]Moosbeckhofer R., 1993, Wachsmotteneine Gefahr fur
den Wabenvorrat. Bienenvater, 6, 261 - 270 [Wax moths-a danger
for stored wax comb.]
[4]Morse R.A., 1978, Honey bee pests, predators
and diseases. Cornell University Press
[5]Shimanuki H., 1981, Controlling the greater wax moth.
USDA publication
[6]Ritter W., Perschil F., Vogel R., 1992, Vergleich der
Wirkung verschiedener Methoden zur Bekampfung von Wachsmotten.
ADIZ (1), 11 - 13 [Comparison of the effect of various methods
for combatting wax moths.]
[7]Mautz D., 1990, >>Giftiger Honig<<, lmkerfreund
(11), 12 - 14 ["Poisonous honey"]
[8]Wallner K., 1991, Das Verhalten von Paradichlorbenzol
in Wachs und Honig ADIZ (9), 29 - 31 [The behavior of PDCB in
wax and honey.]
[9]Spurgin A., 1991, Wachsmottenbekampfung. ADIZ (9),
25 - 26 [Controlling wax moth.]
[10]Jordan R., 1957, Essigsaure zur Bekampfung der Wachsmotte
und vor allem aber zum Entkeimen nosemainfizierter Waben. Bienenvater,
78 (6), 163 - 169 [Acetic acid for controlling wax moth and in
particular for disinfecting nosema-infected combs.]
[11]Gerig L., 1985, Der Schweizerische Bienenvater, Veriag
Sauerlander, 16. Aufl.
[12]Krasnik M., personliche Mitteilung [personal communication.]
[13]Altermatt F., 1996, Die grosse Wachsmotte, eine Uberlebensspezialistin?,
Selbstandige Arbeit, Gymnasium Laufental [The greater wax moth,
a survival specialist? Independent work, Laufental Grammar School.]
|