






 |
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
In 1929, a Russian worker by the name of Savelyeff (62) made
an extensive investigation of the effect of various methods of
killing, treating and preserving the chitinized parts of the
bee skeleton with special reference to the proboscis. In a comparison
of two methods, namely boiling fixation plus preservation in
70% alcohol and direct preservation in alcohol without fixation,
he arrives at the conclusion the the differences obtained in
a composite measurement of the proboscis (submentum plus mentum
plus ligula) are not great enough to be due to any reason other
than error in measuring. While the mentum showed an increase
over the boiling-fixation method plus preservation in 70% alcohol,
the submentum showed a decrease, while the ligula showed no significant
dufference in length. Thus, contrary to Gubin, Savelyeff showed
that the combined measurement of the three parts showed no significant
difference due to the treatment. He agreed with Gubin that the
use of a coefficient or constant to correct the length of the
proboscis is improbable due to the different behavior of the
parts. He differs with Gubin, however, in his conclusion that
the correlation among the parts of the proboscis is the same
as one would find in an examination of untreated material.
Alpatov (2), in 1930, reported the result of an investigation
of proboscides preserved and measured in alcohol in comparison
with proboscides boiled in a 5% solution of potassium hydroxide.
He found that the treatment with potassium hydroxide solution
shortened the total length of the proboscis by 2.6%. At the same
time he investigated the tongue length of the Mingrel bees (Apis
mellifera var. caucasica Gorb.) and showed that
this race had the longest proboscis of any of the races of honeybees.
In Germany, Gotze (29), in 1927, declared that the probability
of error with the Russian technique was so great that it was
impossible to obtain correct results. In consequence, he measured
the second member of the labial palpi as an estimation of the
length of the proboscis. He also made a scientific examination
of the ability of the bees to acquire nectar from several varieties
of clover. Following the precedent of Ewert, he did not measure
the ovary since the nectar stands above it if nectar is present
in sufficient quantity. He found that if the nectar rising in
the corolla tube reached a depth of 7.25 to 7.5 mm., the bees
of one of his colonies, number 47, could regularly acquire nectar,
while the rest of his bees could not work red clover unless the
nectar rose beyond this point or the bee had a proboscis longer
than the mean of its colony. He concluded that, in general, even
those stocks having the longest average length of proboscis do
not meet the requirements of clover storing ability; that, with
each increase in the length of the proboscis, the ability to
acquire nectar from red clover increases markedly; and that certain
existing varieties of red clover can theoretically be used by
those bees having the longest known proboscides. He maintains
that a modification of the length of proboscis due to climate
factors has yet to be proven by experimental data, in spite of
the fact that Russian workers have shown that the length of proboscis
seems to decrease going from south to north.
In regard to the question of how much better use the longer proboscis
will prove to be, we must mention Merrill (42), who, in 1922,
investigated the relation of length of proboscis, carrying capacity
and colony strength to honey storing ability. He determined that
a correlation between length of proboscis alone and storing ability
could not be found, but that the length of the proboscis plus
carrying capacity and colony strength was highly correlated with
yield. He concluded that: (1) there is a distinct correlation
between length of proboscis, carrying capacity and the amount
of honey stored; (2) there is a distinct relation between the
number of bees found in the colony in the spring and the size
of the above named physical characters; (3) that while it is
very strongly indicated that it would be advantageous to a bee
to excel in all three of these physical characters, yet, if she
is deficient in one character, the disadvantage may be overcome
if she possesses one of the other characters to a marked degree.
Hutson (33), in 1926, continued this study, working with small
numbers of bees, and confirmed the above results showing that
there was no marked agreement between length of proboscis and
honey stored, but that there was a marked agreement between the
number of bees in a colony and the yield.
Higher yields from long-tongued races have been reported rather
frequently. In this connection it is well to note that Merrill
and Hutson investigated only modifications of one and the same
race. Zander (73), in 1919, reported unusually high yields from
Caucasian bees in Germany. The constitution of the honey was
at the same time totally different, and Zander believed that
this race prepared the honey in a different manner since the
source must have been the same. Similarly, Tiadmann (67), in
1925, tells how Cirsium oleraceum had been used
by the Krain bees while the native Hannover bees could not acquire
nectar from this source. According to Gotze (29), other high
yields have been reported by conscientious observers such as
Tuschoff and Braun in 1927, but whether these yields were based
upon length of proboscis or other properties is not known.
Furthert contributions to the question concerning the acquisition
of nectar from red clover have been presented at intervals over
a period of years in this country by outstanding figures such
as Folsom (24), Phillips (51), Dadant (17), Demuth (20), Dietz
(21), Pammell (48), Robertson (58), Pellett (50), and Burrill
(11). Robertson believed that the bees perforated the corolla
in order to reach the nectar. Dadant confirmed this statement.
Pellett believed that bees could reach the nectar in some of
the flower tubes, especially in years of drouth. Pammell observed
honeybees on red clover but he did not believe, after measuring
the corolla tube, that the tube is shortened enough by drouth
to enable the bee to reach the nectar in it. Burrill cited many
ways in which the honeybee could acquire nectar from red clover
by means of perforations of the corolla tube due to other insects,
honeydew secreted by aphids on clover, and sap leaks. |
|