






 |
EXPERIMENTAL
After weighing, each bee was placed in a numbered vial containing
tap water at room temperature and throughout the following treatment
was recognized as a definite individual. After being in the water
for 24 hours, the bees were soft enough for dissection. With
the aid of a Spencer Binocular Microscope, containing a 3.5x
ocular and a 55 mm. objective, and an ordinary dissecting set,
the right fore wing, the third tergite, the fourth tergite and
the proboscis of each bee were dissected. The dissected parts
were then mounted directly upon numbered glass slides with Bueston's
medium* and cover glasses were applied.
| *Bueston's Medium
for Mounting |
| Water ...................... |
50 c.c. |
| Glycerine .................. |
20 c.c. |
| Gum Arabic ............... |
40 gm. |
| Chloral Hydrate
......... |
50 gm. |
| Dissolve Gum Arabic
in water. When dissolved, add Chloral Hydrate. When this is dissolved,
add Glycerine. Filter. |
All linear measurements were taken by a projection method. The
numbered glass slide was placed in a Leitz Simple Micro-Projector
in a vertical position and projected upon a movable screen attached
to the opposite wall. Upon the face of the screen was a horizontal
and vertical scale and the screen was so constructed that the
entire face could be rotated around its center in a plane perpendicular
to the line of projection. This feature greatly facilitated measuring
the projected parts since the measuring scale could be turned
to any desired angle at which the part to be measured might happen
to lie. The projection measurement apparatus was arranged so
that a glass Spencer stage micrometer, having a scale 2 mm. in
length ruled to 0.01 mm., placed in the Micro-Projector gave
a corresponding projection of 2 mm. magnified 127 times on the
scale of the movable screen.
The apparatus was calibrated by this method before and at intervals
during each long series of measurements. It was thus possible
to read directly the exact measurement of the part in hundredths
of a millimeter. However, for the sake of convenience and in
order to eliminate any personal equation involved in the reading
of actual measurements of the parts of the bee, a reading was
taken at the beginning of the part and another at its end, the
true measurement being the difference between the two readings.
Plate 1 diagrammatically shows the measurements taken on the
right fore wing, the third tergite and the fourth tergite. Following
the system used by Michailov (43), the widths of the third and
fourth tergites were combined and the summation of the two widths
was used thruout the computation.
 |
Plate
1.
Diagram showing measurements of right fore wing and tergites
3 and 4. |
Plate 2 diagrammatically shows the measurements of the proboscis.
In this manner the length of the submentum, the length of the
mentum and the length of the glossa were obtained, the summation
of the three lengths being the length of the proboscis. In only
one group of bees was the length of the second member of the
labial palpi taken.
 |
Plate
2.
Diagram showing measurements taken of the proboscis.
G = from tip of labellum to anterior part of mentum.
M = length of mentum.
S-M = length of submentum.
L = length of 2nd member of labial palpi.
Length of proboscis = G + M + S-M. |
The computation of the statistics was accomplished by recording
the values of the measurements of each individual bee on a Hollerith
Electric Tabulating and Accounting Machine. From the summations
obtained in this manner, the arithmetic means, standard deviations,
correlation coefficients, regression equations and other statistical
constants were computed with the aid of a Monroe Calculating
Machine. All formulas and methods used in the above computations
are given by Wallace and Snedecor (69) in their bulletin entitled
"Correlation and Machine Calculation" as revised by
Snedecor in 1931. |
|