






 |
EXPERIMENTAL
A. Purpose of Study
The purpose of this experiment is to scientifically study the
increase in size and variability of the worker bee as influenced
by its rearing in brood cells constructed by worker bees on artificial
foundation having an enlarged cell base. Three different cell
sizes were used in this experiment. The number of cells per square
decimeter were, 857, 763 and 706. The foundation having 857 cells
per square decimeter is the standard commercial size manufactured
in the United States while the two latter sizes approximate that
having 750 cells per square decimeter which has been manufactured
since 1896 by Jos. Mees Sons of Herenthals, Belgium and that
having 700 cells per square decimeter which the same firm has
manufactured since 1927.
B. Methods and Materials.
The foundation used in the experiment was furnished by Dadant
and Sons, of Hamilton, Illinois. The sizes furnished were 857
cells per square decimeter (standard size manufactured in the
United States), 763 cells per square decimeter and 706 cells
per square decimeter. The two latter sizes were selected by Mr.
H. C. Dadant and are approximately the same sizes as those being
placed on the market by foundation manufacturers in Belgium and
parts of France. The cutting of special dies and the manufacturing
of the foundation were personally superintended by Mr. Dadant
in order that the resulting cell bases should be true hexagons.
The foundation received with the first shipment contained 7 vertical
wires embedded in each sheet of wax. In addition to the vertical
wires 4 horizontal wires were placed in the frames and embedded
in each sheet of wax by hand. Some trouble was experienced with
this foundation due to its warping between the embedded wires
in warm weather. In the second shipment the foundation contained
10 wires embedded in the vertical position, which, when placed
in a frame wired with 4 horizontal wires, did not warp and resulted
in perfect combs when drawn out by the bees.
Some combs were used which had been constructed from special
foundation placed in certain colonies during the summer of 1929
by Dr. O. W. Park. To facilitate recognition and handling of
the combs, the system used by Dr. Park in marking the frames
was followed in this experiment. The frames containing the standard-size
foundation, having 857 cells per square decimeter, were marked
"A" and one notch was cut in the top-bar. Likewise,
the frames containing the foundation having 763 cells per square
decimeter were marked "B" and two notches were cut
in the top-bar; while the frames containing foundation having
706 cells per square decimeter were marked "C" and
three notches were cut in the top-bar.
Since it is a well established fact that under normal conditions
bees will extend the side walls of the cell and construct a comb
containing cells of the same diameter as the imprint of the cell
base on the artificial foundation, no control of size of cell
other than special foundation was exercised.
Frames containing all three sizes of foundation were placed in
each of 23 colonies of the Iowa State College Apiary early in
the summer of 1930. In general, two frames of each size were
placed in each colony. Individual colony records were kept and
the queens were marked by clipping the right wings of those reared
in an even-numbered year and left wings of those reared in an
odd-numbered year.
An effort was made to collect the bees upon emergence from all
three sizes of cells in a single colony at approximately the
same time and under the same conditions. For this purpose a chart
was made whereby the daily emergence of the bees from each size
of cell was kept for all of the 23 colonies. Each frame was caged
in a Root Nucleus Introducing Cage a day or two before the time
of emergence and a selected area of brood was covered with an
additional small screen cage insuring that the emerging bees
would have no access to any nectar or honey. During the honeyflow,
it was often difficult to find an area of brood that did not
contain some uncapped cells of nectar and honey, and bees were
not collected from such combs.
Each sample collected from a brood comb contained at least 50
bees. During the summer of 1930, over 6000 bees were collected.
During June of 1931, over 600 bees were collected. From these
collections, approximately 3500 were selected as being most suitable
for the experiment. The bees of this group were in sets of 150
bees consisting of three samples of 50 bees each taken from each
of the three sizes of cells from the same colony, from the same
mother and at approximately the same time.
After collecting each sample, the bees were slightly anesthetized,
either with ether or calcium cyanide, and then killed by dropping
into boiling water. This method of killing, as shown by Alpatov
(3), caused the proboscis to be fully extended. The sample was
then preserved in a 70% alcohol solution for further treatment.
The general plan of procedure for measuring the size of the individual
bees of a sample consisted of the following treatment: (1) Determining
the weight of the individual bee. (2) Dissecting the right fore
wing, the third tergite, the fourth tergite and the proboscis
of each individual bee. (3) Mounting these parts for measurement.
(4) Measuring the parts.
Experiments showed that an individual bee taken from a 70% alcohol
solution, dried for a few minutes on a filter paper and placed
on a chemical balance lost weight faster than it could be accurately
weighed. It was thought best, therefore, to take the individual
dry weight of each bee. Further experiments were run which showed
that, by removing the bees from the 70% alcohol solution, drying
on filter paper for several minutes to remove excess preservative
and placing the sample in a De Khotinsky Constant Temperature
Oven Appliance at a constant temperature of 70 degrees centigrade
for 48 hours, the individual bees of the sample no longer lost
any appreciable weight. The sample was then placed in a desiccator
containing concentrated sulfuric acid. Further experiments showed
that after 72 hours the bees had become thoroughly dried and
no appreciable loss of weight occurred.
The individual bees were then taken from the desiccator and weighed
by means of an Eimer and Amend chemical balance accurate to 0.1
mg. A container of fresh calcium chloride was kept within the
chemical balance at all times to dehydrate the contained atmosphere.
It was also found that the repeated opening of the desiccator
during a long serias of weighings caused the individual bees
to increase in weight. This necessitated the weighing of a test
sample at intervals during an extended series of weighings to
determine the average gain in weight of the individual bees.
All weights given in this experiments have, therefore, been corrected
for this factor. |
|