






 |
THE TRUTH ABOUT VARROA IN
BRAZIL
GONCALVES, L. S.; DE
JONG, D. (Brazil)
MORSE, R. A. (U.S.A.)
Varroa is currently recognized to be the greatest problem
for apiculture worldwide. First described in Asiatic bees Apis
cerana, in Indonesia, by the Dutch researcher Oudemans in
1904, the mite turned into a problem for Brazilian bees, Apis
mellifera, in the 1970s. Transfer of the
pest from A. cerana, whose infestation is of little economical
importance, to A. mellifera occurred when beekeepers carried
honeybees to Asia. Today Varroa is found throughout Asia,
in most of Europe, in the Northern region of Africa, in several
countries in the Middle East and in the following South American
countries: Paraguay, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay Peru and Bolivia.
In 1971, infested hives were brought to Paraguay from Japan.
Soon after, in 1972, an apiculturist from Sao Paulo took some
of these Japanese bees to the region of Jundiai, thus initiating
infestation in Brazil. However, infestation was first detected
in 1978 when the pest had spread considerably and there was no
way of eliminating this "new" enemy of Brazilian apiculture.
At present, Varroa can be found in 18 Brazilian States,
from Rio Grande do Sul to Piaui, so that it is too late to avoid
transporting hives from a State to another.
Can we blame the Japanese, or other peoples, or even our own
beekeepers for spreading so much these bees without taking precautions
against possible consequences such as the introduction of Varroa?
In a way, we can. All those who work in apiculture should
he aware of the possible consequences of their carelessness,
especially those involved in ''migrant apiculture'' at the international
level. A period of quarantine is always recommended to
avoid the entry of pests into the country. In 1971, Varroa
was little known and the problems of hive mortality, which
were already occurring in Russia, were not properly communicated
to the Western world. In Eastern Europe also, Varroa was
present 4 to 6 years before being detected. Not even West Germany,
where apiculture is well organized and controlled, succeeded
in containing Varroa.
Research on Varroa in Brazil
The Department of Genetics of the University
of Sao Paulo, Campus of
Ribeirao Preto, started a research program on Varroa
in 1979 under our direction and with the financial support
of the Foundation for the Advancement of Science in the
State of Sao Paulo (FAPESP) and later of the National Research
Council (CNPq). ln 1980, a collaborative program between USP
and the Department of Entomology of Cornell University was started,
with the financial support of the National Science Foundation
(NSF) and later of the Department of Agriculture, USA (USDA).
As part of this program, Dr. De Jong came to Brazil in 1980,
where he is currently involved in research.
It was soon observed that Varroa had spread considerably
but with low indices of infestation. The mite showed no symptoms
to the beekeepers who did not know it, since at the beginning
of infestation Varroa is present in very reduced numbers
in hives, although it rapidly transfers from hive to hive through
new field bees which get lost during the first recognizance flights
and through drones, which tend to enter other hives.
What is Varroa?
Varroa is an acarid which attacks honeybees. It is a
relatively large brown mite 1-mm long and 1.6-mm wide. Varroa
feeds on bee "blood" (hemolymph). Normally, only
adult females can be seen. The other female stages (nymphs) and
males are found only in bee brood cells and are smaller and white.
These also feed on bee "blood" (except for adult males
which do not feed on anything). When compared with other types
of pests, Varroa, reproduces slowly. Under ideal conditions,
the mite leaves on average one to two new female descendents
per cycle in worker bee brood. Without taking into account mortality
or migration to other hives, an infestation starting with a single
female may take approximately 400 days to include 5000 acarids.
At the same time, many of these females may be moving to other
hives, and therefore it would take even longer for an initial
infestation to reach a damaging level. Obviously, if infestation
started by introduction of well-infested hives into a beekeeping
unit of a migratory type, proliferation becomes more rapid. Also,
Varroa multiplies more rapidly at the time of drone rearing,
with a single female capable of producing 2 to 4 new females
in a drone cell.
Our studies have shown that Varroa reduces the weight
and mean life of bees that were infested during development.
When infestation is low, however, the beekeeper does not detect
this damage. When a single larva is attacked by 5 or more acarids
it can still survive, but its body, and the wings in particular,
will be visibly damaged. However, very few bees are attacked
by so many acarids, and when this happens they are thrown out
by the other bees, so that the beekeeper will not see the problem.
Hive mortality caused by Varroa
Millions of hives have already died in Europe because
of Varroa. Tens of thousands have died in Argentina. In
many regions of the world it is impossible to keep bees without
treating them. In Brazil thus far, no hive death caused by Varroa
has been reported. even though the mite reached Brazil before
being introduced into Argentina. A completely unexpected phenomenon
has occurred, since greater infestation was expected in our climate,
which permits Varroa to reproduce throughout the year,
in contrast to countries with cold climates, where Varroa
does not reproduce in winter.
Fortunately until now we escaped relatively well, since our levels
of infestation with the pest are low, whereas they are very high
in the rest of the world. However, Varroa still
causes serious concern. Even though the level of infestation
is low and does not cause death of hives, there is still damage,
because all hives in the country are progressively becoming infested.
Infestation causes little damage per hive, but if we sum all
the hives, great waste occurs in our apiculture.
We can estimate the damage caused by Varroa as
follows: our studies have shown that the mean life of bees infested
with Varroa during development is reduced by half. Thus,
for each two bees affected, we actually lose one. If 2% of worker
brood is infested, the population of the hive will be reduced
by 1%. We may estimate that his would cause a 1% reduction in
honey production. Since national production in 1984 was estimated
at about 30,000 tons, the reduction would be approximately 300
tons which, at the cost price of Cr$9,500.00 per kilogram, would
cause a loss of about 3 billion cruzeiros (about 300,000 US$).
The ideal would be for all beekeepers to be able to treat their
bees to save them and to guarantee honey productioin. However,
the solution is not so simple, since so far there is no adequate
pesticide for the conditions prevailing in Brazil. Either the
treatment is too expensive, or is harmful for the bees, or it
contaminates the honey. If one opted for treatment with chemical
products, such treatment should be applied every year, at a cost
that would be higher than the loss caused by Varroa. |
|