






 |
RAISING AND INTRODUCTION OF
QUEENS.
Creatures grow by transfusion of material in their living bodies,
and the more solidity their tissues have, the more slowly does
this transfusion occur. Some flesh-flies, in the earlier part
of their larval state, will increase in weight two or three hundred
times in twentyfour hours - a rate of development absolutely
forbidden, by physiological and chemical laws, to creatures of
larger proportions; for, other things being equal, as the size
increases the rate of development must decrease. The inconceivably
minute monad, weighing a fraction of a billionth of a grain,
by absorbing nutrition doubles its weight and divides every four
minutes. If food abound, and the fluid surrounding the
creature be free of enemies and not circumscribed, it, in the
course of three or four hours may produce in its descendants
an amount of living, moving material exceeding the weight of
the largest elephant; while the latter animal, with its
digestive and assimilative powers stimulated to the uttermost,
could only, in the same time, add a few ounces to the
weight of its body.
The economics of the question must not be overlooked. In gathering
from clover, it has been shown that about 1/350th grain is secured
at each visit. Let us imagine that our bee is enlarged twice,
by which its weight has grown eight-fold. As it flies,
carrying its large body from clover-bloom to clover-bloom, an
amount of wear and tear is involved which is eight times
as great as that accompanying similar movements in the normal
bee. This wear and tear is replaced by food - of course, proportionately
augmented, and which has to be deducted from the 1/350th grain
secured. The net increase to the stock is, therefore, less at
each visit, in the case of the larger bee, than in that of the
normal one. The former, however, has the advantage of being able
to decrease its return visits to the hive to unload, because
its honey-sac is larger; but this is the only gain, and it is
much more than counter-balanced by the fact that, with normal
bees, eight independent gatherers would be at work simultaneously
for only the same wear and tear that would permit of the
efforts of one if the bulk were increased as supposed. Selection
has gone on for ages regulating the proportions of the wondrous
insect between those extremes in which the loss by excessively
frequent returns to the colony, and the loss through excessive
bodily weight, balance each other, and has thus given us a bee
whose size yields the best possible results.
The botanical reason for desiring no alteration was expounded
in Vol. 1. Flowers and bees have been constantly interacting.
The build of every floret is adapted to that of its fertiliser,
and, could we suddenly increase the dimensions of our hive bees,
we should throw them out of harmony with the floral world around
them, decrease their utility, by reducing the number of plants
they could fertilise, and diminish equally their value as honey-gatherers.
Mechanics, physiology, economics, and botany alike, show any
craving after mere size to be an ill-considered and unscientific
fancy, for which it would be even difficult to find an excuse. |
|