|
THE EFFICIENCY OF THE USE
OF ENLARGED CELLS
HONEY-COMBS IN THE CONDITIONS OF ROMANIA
C. ANTONESCU
ROMANIA
"The large cell" preoccupied and continues to preoccupy
many beekeepers and scientists in numerous countries. Etienne
de Meyer (Belgium), in the first report presented to the XI-th
International Congress of Apiculture (Paris 1-17 August 1937)
said:
The large cell is only a selection, better said a means of selection...''
In his opinion the possible limit might be that of 575-600 cells
per dm2, that is, cells with a diameter of about 6.3-6.2
mm. He also demonstrated that the bee ''adapts itself" to
the cell put at its disposal, and that only an artificial honey-comb
with cells of a corresponding size would permit to maintain the
bee's size and body dimensions.
The second report presented to the same Congress by Dr. A.
Zappi Racordati (Italy), on the theme "The problems of the
large cell in Italy'', mentioned among others:
"To obtain larger bees it would not be sufficient to use
honey-combs with cells larger in size than those normally
built by the bees, but, it will be necessary to find a way of
obtaining as large as possible bee queen and drones. Periodic
replacement of the honey-combs is always a very important measure
which permits to guarantee to the bee the best conditions of
development: it would thus seem necessary to make this replacement
also in case the larger cells are adopted"...
"We have in Italy too, enthusiastic adherents for enlarging
the bees by means of the Baudoux method. Measurements made with
the greatest accuracy by the National Institute of Apiculture,
using a single method (that of De Meyer and Trannazer) on a considerable
number of working-bees honey-combs, belonging to the pure Apis
ligustica race, have clearly proved that size of cells - even
in relatively limited zones - varies within wide enough limits,
more exactly between 860-760 per dm2".
Under the influence of the above mentioned reports, I set myself
the purpose to experiment on the efficiency of large cell honey-combs.
This was possible beginning with the year 1941 when I was able
to build honey-combs with cells of 5.65 mm and 5.85 mm diameter,
that is, 726 and respectively 678 cells per dm2.
The experiment (in the year 1941) comprised 4 local race (Region
of Ploiesti) bee families living in Dadant beehives with 12 standard
frames and stores, and working in honey-combs with cells of 5.4
mm diameter (794 cells per dm2). The experience lasted 4 years. Two
of the bee-families from the experimental group were completly
shaken off into new hives equipped with artificial honey-combs
and cells of 5.65 mm diameter. For the other two families, the
artificial honey-comb frames with enlarged cells were intercalated
in the brood-nests, during the intense Acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia
L.) and linden-tree (Tilia) harvest. All the bee-families of
the experimental group behaved almost identically: the majority
of the cells were transformed in drone cells and a small part
occupied by brood-nests of working-bees, but with thickened walls.
During the following years (1942-1944) the experiment was repeated
with the same number of bee-families and identical unfavorable
results. During the years 1954-1958 I adopted a new working method:
the artificial honey-combs with enlarged cells were used for
building up and honey storing during the intense harvest period
for other colonies and after the honey extraction they were used
for the colonies of the experimental group (during the following
season) for brood breeding, using as for the first experiment,
the shake-off method. The honey-yield of the colonies from the
experimental and control groups, in the conditions of stationary
bee-breeding, is shown in table 1.
Table 1
| Bee
colony group |
No. of bee colony |
Year 1954 (kg) |
Year 1955 (kg) |
Year 1956 (kg) |
Year 1957 (kg) |
Year 1958 (kg) |
Average for 1954-1958
(kg) |
| Experimental group
(cells 5.65 mm) |
6 |
19.0 |
15.6 |
34.9 |
6.8 |
20.0 |
19.4 |
| Control group (cells
5.4 mm) |
6 |
17.1 |
13.7 |
29.3 |
5.8 |
17.4 |
16.6 |
| Average increase
% (experimental group) |
--- |
11.1 |
13.8 |
19.1 |
17.2 |
19.5 |
16.9 |
An analysis of the figures in table 1 shows that the yield-increase
obtained from the experimental group bee colony during the 5
years of experiment varied between 11.1 and 15.5% or in average
by 16.9% per year which can be considered a positive factor for
the efforts which every beekeeper is undertaking in order to
increase production and investment rentability in apiculture.
Experimentation with enlarged cells frames (5.65 mm) was successfully
undertaken by beekeeper Vladimir Cudelca of the Region of Bacau
(city of Roman), in the middle of the province of Moldavia, with
a group of 5 bee colony during the years 1957-1963. According
to his statement, the increase of production he obtained was
over 20% yearly, which might mean that also in other regions
of our country the enlarged cell can and must contribute to the
productivity of the apiaries in our country.
Further researches (Eng. E. Mirza and collab., 1962) revealed
data which are supporting a large-scale use of enlarged cells
honey-combs. These researches are showing that in the bee-population
of our country the cell size of the natural honey-comb presents
a great variability, depending on the zone. Thus in the Transylvanian
highland the average horizontal diameter is 5.50 mm, the differences,
as compared to that average, ranging between the limits of 5.24-5.88
mm. It is to be mentioned that in the mountainous zone the size
varies with in the limits of 5.35-5.88 mm.
Conclusions
1. Experiments with a large
cell honey-comb in the conditions of the Socialist Republic of
Romania (5.65 mm) show that a large scale introduction of such
honey-combs represents an important reserve for the increase
of the bee-hive's productivity in all sectors. To this aim it
is necessary that the honey-comb should be build up first - during
intense harvesting - in other colonies or in the respective colonies
for honey-storage, and only afterwards it should be used for
brood breeding.
2. Recent researches concerning the cell size of the natural
honey-comb built by the bee-population of our country show that
there is a great size-variability and that in the mountainous
zone these sizes greatly overstep the artificial honey-comb cell
size which we have experimented (5.88 mm). Consequently, in a
zone which represents approximately a third of the territory
of the S. R. Romania, the use of honey-combs having cells with
a horizontal diameter of 5.65 and even 5.88 mm constitutes a
problem of acute actuality.
3. In all countries where research-work is showing that, in certain
zones the bee-colonies are building natural honey-combs, it is
to be recommended that the bee-colonies should have at their
disposal honey-combs with cells as nearly as possible to the
size of cells which bees are building naturally.
REFERENCES
The XI-th International Congress of Apiculture - in "Romania
Apicola",
No. 11-12/1937.
Etienne De Meyer - The work of Baudoux, in "Romania
Apicola", No. 2/1938.
Antonescu C. - The efficiency of the use of enlarged -
cells honey-combs
in "Apicultura", 1959.
Mirza E., eng. and collab. - Data concerning the size
of cells in S.R.R.
honey-combs, in "Apicultura", 1961.
|