ABJ – December 1992 – Volume 132/No. 1233.
Wenner, A. M.
That science is a process rather than an accomplishment is exemplified by the ongoing question of how honey bees (Apis mellifera) forage and recruit hivemates to resources. Ever since Aristotle, those who have studied recruitment to food sources have favored either one of two hypotheses, odor-search or “language” use (see table and Wenner, et al., 1991, Amer. Zool. 31:768-782). Von Frisch embraced an odor-search hypothesis in 1937 (e.g., Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution for the Year Ended June 30, 1938, pp. 423-431) but then proposed the “dance language” hypothesis in 1946 (The dances of the honey bee. Bull. Anim. Behav. 5:1-32, 1947 -Translated from: Die Tanze der Bienen. Oesterr. Zoolog. Zeitsch. 1:1-48, 1946). By contrast, our group embraced the language hypothesis before 1965, but adopted an odor-search hypothesis after additional evidence became available.
The von Frisch dance language hypothesis swept the world, even though that hypothesis remained untested for 20 years and the results of his early field experiments were inconclusive. Support consensus became so strong that negative results from subsequent definitive tests of the language hypothesis were ignored. Only recently have the experimental designs in the classic 1946 paper been examined critically; now, 46 years after introduction of the language hypothesis, it is becoming evident that von Frisch’s 1937 views on honey bee recruitment to food sources are more applicable to nature than his later hypothesis.
Table – People and/or group leaders and the dates they endorsed one or another hypothesis for recruitment of hivemates to food sources.
|Odor-Search Hypothesis||“Language” Hypothesis|
|Buzzard||1946||Von Frisch||1946 +|
|Rosin||1970 +||Gould||1970 +|