SPECULATIONS ON SURVIVOR HONEY BEE FERAL POPULATIONS IN FLORIDA, USA.
 








TOMAS MOZER, APICULTURAL CONSULTANT/APIARY TECHNICIAN, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA.


The incomplete historical record documenting the origins of Apis mellifera in the Americas is open to interpretation. Crane, E. (1999) cites: "We do not know when honey bees first reached New Spain (Mexico)... As early as 1513, Herrera's Obra de Agricultura mentioned the difficulty of transporting bees to the newly discovered Indies... Brand (1970, pblshd. 1988) concluded...that the Spanish probably introduced honey bees in the 1520's or 1530's... Perkins (1926) quoted verbatim from a report written in the 1600's: 'a swarm must have settled on a ship about to sail from Spain...and on reaching what is now Veracruz the bees flew ashore and...in[to] a cask which a priest provided as a hive'." [The World History of Beekeeping and Honey Hunting; Routledge, N.Y.: (p. 361...)]

Nelson, E. V. (1967) in "History of Beekeeping in the United States" comments: "The actual date of importation of the first colonies of honey bees...to North America is unknown... In 1763, the English introduced colonies of bees into Florida, although they may have been brought earlier to St. Augustine by the Spanish." [Beekeeping in the United States; USDA/ARS Agriculture Handbook no. 335:(p.2...)]

Oertel, E. (1976) writes in "Bicentennial bees: early records of honey bees in the eastern United States" that "Bartram (1792)...noted...bee tree[s] on the banks of the [lower] St. John's river in 1765 and... considerable honey [harvests]... In 1765 De Brahm...began an official land survey in East Florida...[and reported]...bees were frequently seen... Barton (1802) stated that the honey bees in Florida, after having been introduced by the Spaniards, had by 1785 increased into innumerable swarms... We can speculate...about...the feasible routes for swarms to take, whether natural swarms or box hives transported by man...[including] along the Gulf coast." [American Bee Journal 116:70...]

Attempts to elucidate the nature of "New World" feral honey bees need to incorporate observations by Daly, H. V. et al. (1991): "Feral honey bees in California are mongrel populations, partially differentiated in
morphometrics from managed colonies as well as from European
subspecies...The geographic variation is presumably adaptive...[and] points to an underlying genetic differentiation among feral populations in California." ["Clinal geographic variation in feral honey bees in
California, USA"; Apidologie 22:591-609. (abstract):
http://danrrec.ucdavis.edu/sierra_foothill/
research_publications7.html#g_8
]
A preliminary analysis by Mozer, T. (2002) of Florida "ferals" found in the vicinity of ports-of-entry points to similarities in reports of the survival of feral bees with "non-commercial" lineage, suggesting naturalized "New World" ecotypes that are conceivably descendants of the earliest introductions. ["Observations on feral honey bees in Florida, USA"; http://www.flareal.com/fsbanews.htm]

The complexities of understanding honey bee ancestry are illustrated in a study by Schiff, N. M. & Sheppard, W. S. (1993) on genetic variation of feral populations in the southern U.S. in which "422 feral bee colonies [were] sampled...from nine states (Florida was not included)... [and] results are as follows: [~22% were of] European honey bee races considered 'western' races (A. mellifera mellifera/A. mellifera iberica)...[~77% were of] 'eastern' races (A. mellifera carnica/A. mellifera ligustica)...thought to make up the majority of the present U.S. commercial honey bee stock...[~1%] African mtDNA was from the Egyptian honey bee (A. mellifera lamarckii), not A. mellifera scutellata [from sub-Saharan Africa]." ["Mitochondrial DNA evidence for the 19th century introduction of African honey bees into the United States"; Experientia 49:350-352. (cited in APIS newsletter):
http://www.ifas.ufl.edu/~mts/apishtm/apis94/apjul94.htm#2]

In a later publication, Schiff & Sheppard (1995) report that "commercial
bees...[are] significantly different than the feral population of the
southern United States, where 36.7% of 692 feral colonies had the A.m. mellifera/iberica haplotype (Schiff et al. 1994). The lack of A.m. mellifera[/iberica] haplotypes in the commercial population is indicative of restricted gene flow between feral and commercial populations. Until A.m. ligustica was introduced by bee breeders in 1859, A.m. mellifera[/iberica] was the only subspecies present in the United States. Gene flow between commercial and feral populations likely has occured through swarming and open matings since that time. However, the maternally inherited mtDNA of A.m. mellifera[/iberica] has made little intrusion into commercial populations, demonstrated by the low frequency of A.m. mellifera[/iberica] mtDNA haplotypes in this group (3%). Perhaps, through selection or other breeding practices, bee breeders have contributed to this asymmetry in mtDNA haplotype frequencies. A [third] haplotype, A.m. lamarckii, which was present in 2% of feral colonies (Schiff et al. 1994) was not found in the sampled breeder queen population." ["Genetic Analysis of Commercial Honey Bees from the Southeastern United States". J. Econ. Entomol.
88(5):1216-1220. http://www.beesource.com/pov/ahb/jee1995.htm]

Coincidentally, Hall, H. G. & McMichael, A. M. (2001) found that "Frequencies of Restriction Fragment-Length Polymorphisms Indicate That Neotropical Honey Bee Populations Have African and West European Origins: In this study, ancestry in New World bees was inferred from allele identities and frequencies at a highly polymorphic nuclear locus in Old and New World honey bee populations...in combination with mitochondrial DNA types. In bees from the United States, collected before the invasion of African bees, east and west European alleles were found at frequencies of 83 and 17%, respectively, which is consistent with previously identified nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers. Colonies from two neotropical countries, Mexico and Honduras, had African mitochondrial DNA and high frequencies of African nuclear DNA alleles. Consistent with previous findings, east European alleles were absent or detected at low frequencies in these colonies. However, west European alleles were found at frequencies from 26 to 31%. These results suggest that queen offspring of the African queens first introduced into Brazil mated with west European drones, incorporating neutral markers that have since remained in the expanding population of feral African bees. The results point to little paternal introgression from managed east European colonies encountered by the African bees spreading through the neotropics."
[Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94(5): 670-676.
http://esa.edoc.com/annals/v94n5/v94n5p670.pdf]

It is interesting to note an apparent parallel in an "Old World" setting, as communicated by Franck, P. et al. (1998): "Apis mellifera is composed of [at least] three evolutionary branches including mainly African (branch A), West and North European (branch M) and South-East European (branch C) populations. The existence of morphological clines extending from the equator to the polar circle through Morocco and Spain raised the hypothesis that the branch M originated in Africa. Mitochondrial DNA analysis revealed that branches A and M were characterized by highly diverged lineages implying very remote links between both branches. It also revealed that mtDNA haplotypes from lineages A coexisted with haplotypes M in the Iberian peninsula and formed a South-North frequency cline, suggesting that this area could be a secondary contact zone between the two branches... [The] higher haplotype A variability observed in Spanish and Portuguese samples compared to that found in Africa is explained by a higher mutation rate and multiple and recent introductions. Selection appears as the best explanation to the morphological and allozymic clines and to the diffusion and maintenance of African haplotypes in Spain and Portugal." ["The origin of West European subspecies of honeybees: new insights from mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite data"; Evolution 52(4):1119-1134. (abstract):
http://www.ensam.inra.fr/URLB/apis/evolution/evolution.html]

Whether the remnant populations in Florida will continue to survive in the face of numerous stresses remains unresolved in light of similar scenarios, including the fate of feral honey bees in Arizona and Texas as observed by Baum, K. A. et al. (199?): "Few studies have documented population trends for feral colonies, but Loper (1997) reported an 82 percent decline in spring populations from 1992 to 1997 [in Arizona]...The observed population trends [in Texas] correspond to the arrival of Varroa mites and Africanized honey bees. Varroa mites were first recorded on the Welder Refuge in 1995. By 1996, the feral populations had declined dramatically. Africanization began to increase in 1995, with all the colonies Africanized by 1998...These data suggest populations of European feral honey bees were decimated by Varroa mites in 1995, and then replaced by Africanized honey bees in the following years." ["Effects of Landscape Pattern on the Distribution of Feral Honey Bee Colonies in South Texas"; http://kelab.tamu.edu/standard/honeybees/].
However, recent findings (pers. communication, W. L. Rubink) of ~25% European mtDNA persisting in the Texas feral population are encouraging.

Likewise, reports of mite tolerant populations from Arizona give one reason for optimism, as anecdotal evidence shows our study population in northeast Florida approaches infestation levels over 5 years without treatments (pers. observations, T. Mozer), comparable to those of Erickson, E. et al. (1999): "A long term study was undertaken to determine whether a varroa-tolerant honey bee population could be developed and maintained via selective breeding and conventional beekeeping practices, and without the use of other mite control strategies. The results of this study conducted at an isolated site
demonstrate that it is relatively easy to find varroa-tolerant colonies, and to produce and maintain varroa-tolerant strains of honey bees. This Varroa tolerant population has survived for nearly five years with mean annual infestation level between 6 and 7 percent." ["Varroa-Tolerant Honey Bees Are A Reality", (abstract):
http://www.nps.ars.usda.gov/publications/
publications.htm?lognum=0000106275
]

Research is currently underway at the University of Florida beelab
[http://www.ifas.ufl.edu/~hgh/deptpage/hgh_biog.htm] on quantitative trait loci (QTL) involved in suppression of Varroa mite reproduction (SMR): "SMR is latent in bee populations and can be greatly enhanced through selective breeding. The goal of this project is to find DNA markers associated with SMR, thereby locating the genes responsible (QTL) along genetic maps. Markers associated with the trait would facilitate selecting from different sources of bees and combining SMR with other desirable traits. This project will use bees from Louisiana already selected for SMR and will select for SMR from Florida bees that have survived the mite without treatment." [Abstract 2001-02839;
http://www.reeusda.gov/nri/pubs/abstracts/2001/entnem.pdf]

 

Disclaimer: the views expressed do not represent the State and/or University of Florida's official positions. Copyright © 2002 by Tomas Mozer, all rights reserved.
Copyleft: Verbatim copying of this document is permitted, in any medium, under Design Science License terms and conditions (see
http://dsl.org/copyleft/dsl.txt).

   
  © 1999-2002 BeeSource.Com