|
Wednesday, August 28, 2002
U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE AND FOOD
& DRUG ADMINISTRATION UNCOVER DUMPING SCHEME INVOLVING CONTAMINATED
HONEY IMPORTS FROM CHINA
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. Customs Service (Customs) and the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced that they
have discovered bulk imports of Chinese honey that were contaminated
with low levels of chloramphenicol (CAP), a potentially harmful
antibiotic and unapproved food additive. The contaminated honey
was detected during an investigation into a widespread scheme
to evade payment of U.S. anti-dumping duties on bulk imports
of Chinese honey.
To date, the investigation
has resulted in the detention of more than 50 containers of bulk
Chinese honey at U.S. ports. In an effort to evade U.S. anti-dumping
duties, this honey had allegedly been illegally transshipped
through third-party countries on its way from China to America.
Some of the bulk honey in these
containers has tested positive for chloramphenicol, an antibiotic
used, in most cases, only to treat life-threatening infections
in humans when other alternatives are not available. Use of chloramphenicol
is limited because this antibiotic is associated with a very
rare, but potentially life-threatening side effect - idiosyncratic
aplastic anemia. For the very small number of people susceptible
to this side effect, exposure to chloramphenicol could be serious.
A "safe" limit of chloramphenicol for such people has
not been established. Nevertheless, the probability of this reaction
occurring in the general population from food exposure is thought
to be very low.
To protect the public from
unnecessary exposure to potentially harmful substances, food
and animal feed products containing chloramphenicol are illegal
in the United States. Currently, Customs is stopping all suspect
bulk honey imports to this country for the FDA to determine whether
they contain chloramphenicol. Any shipments containing chloramphenicol
will be detained. The FDA is unaware at present of contaminated
honey being on retail shelves, but is continuing its investigation
into this matter. Thus far, no illnesses have been reported in
association with the imported honey.
As part of the investigation,
Customs and FDA agents during the past week have executed search
warrants on businesses and residences in Los Angeles, Newark,
Tampa, and other locations. Australian Customs, Royal Malaysian
Customs, and Royal Thai Customs have also executed warrants in
Australia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Additional enforcement activity
is anticipated in the investigation.
"This investigation should
serve notice that U.S. Customs will not tolerate unfair trading
practices, especially those that pose potential health risks
to the American public," said U.S. Customs Commissioner
Robert C. Bonner. "This case is an excellent example of
cooperation between U.S. Customs, the FDA, as well as authorities
in Australia, Thailand, and Malaysia."
"We will continue to work
with our federal and international partners to ensure that products
that cross our borders meet our high standards for food safety,"
said FDA Deputy Commissioner Dr. Lester M. Crawford. "The
FDA will take whatever action is necessary to protect the public
health from these kinds of activities."
The probe into this scheme
began primarily as a dumping investigation. Dumping of a product
occurs when merchandise manufactured outside of the United States
is sold in the United States at a price that is below the cost
of production, or below the price sold in the foreign home market.
Foreign manufacturers and or/importers may dump products on the
U.S. market in order to gain market share because of political
or social concerns or to maximize profits/minimize losses in
production.
In Sept. 2000, several U.S.
honey producers filed an unfair trade case alleging dumping of
honey imports from China. In May 2001, the U.S. Commerce Department
issued a notice of preliminary determination which required U.S.
Customs to collect anti-dumping duties on imports of natural
bees honey from certain Chinese companies. The duty rates increased
between 34 and 184 percent.
The U.S. Customs Attaché
in Bangkok, Thailand, subsequently received information that
certain honey exports from China were allegedly being illegally
transshipped through Thailand en route to the United States.
The purpose of the alleged transshipment scheme was to circumvent
payment of anti-dumping duties on Chinese honey imports to the
United States.
In June 2002, U.S. Customs
Attachés in Bangkok and Singapore launched an investigation
and began working with their law enforcement counterparts in
Australia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Officials from the Royal Thai
Customs, Royal Malaysian Customs, and Australian Customs provided
substantial assistance. Several domestic U.S. Customs offices
joined the investigation, including those in Los Angeles, Newark,
Tampa, Houston, Detroit, and Seattle.
Soon, Customs agents found
that U.S.-bound Chinese bulk honey was allegedly being transshipped
through Australia, Mexico, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and other
nations to evade U.S. anti-dumping duties. During the investigation,
Customs officers in Los Angeles drew samples of bulk Chinese
honey from several detained containers that had arrived at the
local port. A laboratory analysis found that the honey samples
contained chloramphenicol. Customs notified the FDA, which immediately
joined the investigation given the health issues associated with
chloramphenicol. Analysis by FDA laboratories confirmed the presence
of chloramphenicol in the imported Chinese honey.
Since the discovery of chloramphenicol
in the Chinese honey imports, Customs has been stopping all suspect
bulk imports of honey for the FDA to test for the presence of
chloramphenicol. The FDA has developed a method to confirm chloramphenicol
levels in honey at one part per billion.
The FDA and Customs are continuing
to coordinate their enforcement strategies and will be detaining
or seizing any honey imports that contain chloramphenicol to
ensure that they are not released for human or animal consumption
in the United States.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Kim Flottum
Editor, Bee Culture Magazine
|