and for the record there appears to be only one other dissenting vote, unless of course as has been conjectured it is a duplicate.
journaling the growth of a treatment free apiary started in 2010. 20+/- hives
No, he implied specific individuals and generally everyone else were selling tainted honey.
Buy the ticket, take the ride. -H.S. Thompson
Kind of an annoying quirk, but hey we all have one or two so it's no big deal, your pretty bright WLC and add a lot to discussions.
Keep on, be a pretty dull place around here without some overt personalities.
(6th year, Zone 5b, 5506')
Given the fact that changing your user name isn't allowed, it would seem to logically follow that re-registering with a different id wouldn't be allowed either. One could just have a debate with his alter ego if this were permitted. Would that make Beesource a better place?
"People will generally accept facts as truth only if the facts agree with what they already believe."- Andy Rooney
The banned person was repeatedly attacked personally. I guess it all depends upon the agreed upon values and interpretations of what one finds in the Google search.
On second thought, would you please tell me how I should think or at least lets get into issues that I thought were totally irrelevant, i.e., another's life outside this forum.
Silly me, here I was thinking the only thing relevant was the topic of discussion and here I find out a whole lot more is involved. I'm starting to get it.
Now, we are getting somewhere. So I'm clear please let me know what are acceptable political positions and what are not.
Raw honey, pesticides, certain political views are verboten. What else?
Fellas, you keep making Sweet's point for him/her.
Besides, there's room for only one WLC on this forum.
Deliberately creating a second Beesource identity - and quite possibly using a false location to do so - is a serious rules violation in itself. Anyone who doubts that might want to recall the Beemaster01 / BeeBeetle Longcreek Apiaries dual identity situation.
. . . . . . "those who want to see, can see". - - [Oldtimer - 2016]
Based on the style of writing and presenting arguments, I am back to thinking that the anonymous "Sweet" is indeed the banned person.
(6th year, Zone 5b, 5506')
WLC. has made a sweeping g claim that most of the bee researchers are compromised by their associations with beeologics /Monsanto.
....yet his funding and associations (and published work) remain secret. He and his work are 'mmune from the Knesset of criticism he tosses around freely.
What if he were Jim Fischer? Brett Adee? JEFF Pettis? On the beet sugar promotion board? What if he works for Bayer? What if he has tried to publish 100 papers and not a one passed peer review?
“Siri, tell Amazon to drone me a beer.” -Homer Simpson
Once again, that's a personal attack, and you keep demonstrating Sweet's point.