Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 33 of 33
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Fort Walton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    1,256

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    Quote Originally Posted by odfrank View Post
    >
    How much time are you saving? The same goes for mono-filament line IMHO. What is the savings and benefit over the proven method of using wires?
    For foundationless, I think the advantage of heavy monofilament is that its diameter is so much greater than wire, so that it is less likely to cut the comb when the comb is soft. Plus it's faster to install than wire, the way I do it.
    Ray--1 year, 7 hives, TF

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    2,930

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    I tried using monofilament but the bees chewed it out of the comb in less than a year. Never tried wire. I plan on using the skewers. I used small diameter dowel in my top bar for the first ten bars or so. it has worked well. one dowel has gotten broken off and it tends to casue the bees to mis direct the comb as they draw it so I did not put it on the rest of the bars. The comb has since been corrected.
    Stand for what you believe, even if you stand alone.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Nehawka, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    45,925

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    >has anyone else tried it?

    I've done a dowel but not the skewers. I don't think it's much different.

    >For foundationless, I think the advantage of heavy monofilament is that its diameter is so much greater than wire, so that it is less likely to cut the comb when the comb is soft.

    Wire needs to be crimped. Then it disperses the stress over a larger area and in different directions.
    Michael Bush bushfarms.com/bees.htm "Everything works if you let it." ThePracticalBeekeeper.com 40y 200h 37yTF

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Santa Monica, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,492

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    All my bars in medium-size category have no additional support. Bars for deep-size box needed some side support.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Серёжа, Sergey

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    jackson county, alabama, usa
    Posts
    4,403

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    nice pics sergey! that honey looks good enough to eat!
    journaling the growth of a treatment free apiary started in 2010. 20+/- hives

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Santa Monica, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,492

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    O, thank you! My bees are working very hard even in winter. Honey from those frames were extracted on Christmas day, thus - it is "Christmas honey"!
    Серёжа, Sergey

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    jackson county, alabama, usa
    Posts
    4,403

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    good work and congratulations. i know how special it is to enjoy your own honey!
    journaling the growth of a treatment free apiary started in 2010. 20+/- hives

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX, USA
    Posts
    1,766

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    I use 20 lb fishing line, bees haven't chewed through it.
    Time to be a gypsy again, 2014 will be my prep year, my bees want a better area with actual rainfall.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Campbell, Wyoming USA
    Posts
    425

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    I have a lot of deep frames that I have that are foundationless, that wax looks pretty white odfrank, and I noticed it's not attached on the sides. I have had some break out like that, and the majority of the ones that do are not attached. I don't run foundationless in my supers just in my brood boxes. I have noticed the ones in the brood boxes that get a little bit of age to them have quite a bit more rigidity; however, I do have some that will crack throughout the entire comb but not fall out (these bloody Wyoming winters will reek havoc on them, maybe the expansion and contraction of a -20F night followed by a 40F high the next day?) but as long as they don't fall out the bees will patch them up in the spring. I do really like having the BB's foundationless so I'm in the process of moving all of my rite-cell into my supers and all of my BB's foundationless, it's been about a two year process for fifty colonies, pleased with the results so far.
    We the willing have done so much with so little for so long we can now do anything with nothing

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    South Hamilton, MA
    Posts
    14

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    This is my 1st year. I put up 7 traps (mostly cardboard boxes) on June 11 and caught my bees on June 20. I'm supposed to put traps up in April and catch bees in mid May to mid June.

    My plan was to use foundation in the 1st box and checkerboard up. In the future I could get more hives and use healthy drawn comb to checkerboard new swarms, so I'm completely foundationless.
    Frames I have: 50 foundationless, 10 foundation
    setup: all 10 frame mediums (all unwired)
    Perhaps I should have used all deeps. 90 lbs isn't much for me, and shouldn't be much for most people (provided they have a healthy diet).

    There are some rules I found/follow.
    1. Make the hive level.
    2. Don't tilt the frames unless they are fully drawn, and preferably not hot.
    3. Checkerboard (place drawn comb in-between empty frames).
    - Comb used in checkerboarding should have lots of brood, or a lot of it should be capped.
    4. Empty frames should have something to direct the bees to hang from the middle. In the future I will buy foundationless frames from kelleybees.com.

    An elderly woman agreed to inspect my hive. She appeared to be experienced, and spoke a lot about her experience. I told her to not tilt frames, but she tilted one, and I had to reattach the comb. She also crushed a lot of bees (possibly even 10). Even with all of this, my bees didn't sting. I will requeen them to make them more aggressive as soon as possible. I've never used smoke.

    questions for the op
    Why would someone extract honey from a frame that's not drawn?
    Did the op break a rule?

    questions
    An experienced guy tried checkerboarding with wired foundationless frames. He said the bees built around the wire. Should the wire/skewers be coated in wax? Michael Bush said he extracts from unwired mediums.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX, USA
    Posts
    1,766

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    white wax is not as strong. I use wedge frames so they draw from the center and I've not had a problem with extraction or comb falling apart, and ahem, its hot in Texas. Bee inspector slightly damaged one foundationless frame last year but not a total collapse. I don't wire mediums.

    And 90 lbs is a lot for me, I just got my spine all back in line today, not allowed to lift that full deep for a day or 2, and it would be better if I pull the frames and split them into nucs when I pull it.
    Time to be a gypsy again, 2014 will be my prep year, my bees want a better area with actual rainfall.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Worcester County, Massachusetts
    Posts
    3,591

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    I would seriously doubt that wire would strengthen fresh soft and full combs of honey better than a wooden skewer or slat. Remember that the purpose of wiring was always to keep the foundation from buckling, not to strengthen the comb.
    The irony is free. It's the sarcasm you are paying for....ironically.
    -Felicity Jones in "Chalet Girl"

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    St. Albans, Vermont
    Posts
    5,322

    Default Re: Another disadvantage with Foundationless

    Quote Originally Posted by deknow View Post
    Remember that the purpose of wiring was always to keep the foundation from buckling, not to strengthen the comb.
    And cross wires with wired foundation don't strengthen the comb?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Ads