As I am fond of saying, this definition was voted on by forum users. If forum users would like to see it changed, then I am certainly open to suggestions.
Yes WLC, it is no loss that people not willing to go treatment-free have ceased using the forum. You don't see people going to the commercial forum all the time and arguing what is commercial and what isn't. You don't see people going to the Topbar forum all the time and arguing what is a topbar and what isn't. Yet for some reason, the discussion about what is treatment free and what isn't never ends. And somehow, the line 'natural treatments' and even 'treatment-free treatments' keeps coming up. If it's a treatment, it's a treatment. If you want to talk about treatments, go elsewhere. Funny enough, it's always the group who aren't, trying to tell the group who are that they are not. Why is this?
Casinoken, I'll thank you to spell my name correctly. It's not as though you've never seen it spelled correctly before. It's very disrespectful. And please read the unique forum rules as well, so you will know what is considered a treatment and what is not and why in this forum.




Reply With Quote














Bookmarks