Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: Senate Bill 510

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Milford, Indiana
    Posts
    70

    Default Senate Bill 510

    Has anybody from the Beekeeping Industry reviewed this Senate bill?

    FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (Reported in Senate - RS)[S.510.RS]
    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.510:


    It appears to me this bill will be what opens the door to gov't-as-your-partner in your little ol' beekeeping biz, hobbiests included.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Gilmer,TX USA
    Posts
    1,872

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    There are SO MANY food bills floating around I have finally given up trying to do anything other than staying on top of state issues. I wrote something to the ABJ once about 875 and 759. I would rather just deal with the new regs and go on with life, I do not see a way to stop them.

    mike
    Please check out the new kingfisherapiaries.com!
    Like us on Facebook

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Milford, Indiana
    Posts
    70

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    It's the Law of Unintended Consequences that mucks things up. Somebody needs to have authority to pull harmful stiff form the market place, I don't think anybody disagrees with that statement.

    But the devil's in the details; You can't pull product withou testing, can't test w/o testing protocol and infastructure, can't have infrastructure without establishing staffing.... Where does authority extend too? Checking million egg-a-day facotry farms and ignoring clearly unsanitarybackyard flocks?

    I really, really don't like the gov't sticking their nose in my economic tent, but you can't buy half the enchilada.
    Last edited by Barry; 11-29-2010 at 04:59 PM. Reason: off topic

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bowling Green, Kentucky
    Posts
    420

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    the large industry farms were all for the bill until they put a provision in that it does not extend to small producers and immediately the lobby for industrial farming started pushing against it as it was not going to gain them any market share. does not look like its going to pass now.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    piedmont, KS
    Posts
    234

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    Quote Originally Posted by Deeptime View Post

    It appears to me this bill will be what opens the door to gov't-as-your-partner in your little ol' beekeeping biz, hobbiests included.
    I got letters back from several of the co-sponsors and they are voting against the bill now.

    They are now voting against it with its current changes. It morphed into a very intrusive bill. It also does absolutely nothing to eliminate foods that might be contaminated. All it does is generate a cash flow in regulation and licensing fees.
    Last edited by Barry; 11-30-2010 at 02:10 PM. Reason: off topic/political

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lansing, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    186

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    Quote Originally Posted by slickbrightspear View Post
    the large industry farms were all for the bill until they put a provision in that it does not extend to small producers and immediately the lobby for industrial farming started pushing against it as it was not going to gain them any market share. does not look like its going to pass now.
    so true, this happened with apple cider, now you have to buy the expensive pasteurizers to sell it in stores.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brady, washington
    Posts
    710

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    [QUOTE=.

    I really, really don't like the gov't sticking their nose in my economic tent, but you can't buy half the enchilada.
    [/QUOTE]
    and you don't have to buy the whole enchilada either.
    99.99% of questions can be answered by Just reading books.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Paris, Maine
    Posts
    1,660

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    Quote Originally Posted by D Coates View Post
    A bit touchy aren't we?
    No, just into facts these days. Not opinons stated as facts but actual, substantiated facts.

    Wayne

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Reno, NV USA
    Posts
    2,312

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingfisher Apiaries View Post
    I would rather just deal with the new regs and go on with life, I do not see a way to stop them.
    mike
    The Guillotine worked in France.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    DuPage County, Illinois USA
    Posts
    8,096

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    OH, I'm late to the party I see. We'll back up in this thread and undo the political stuff.
    Regards, Barry

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Columbia county, New York, USA
    Posts
    1,540

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    Another viewpoint on Bill 510:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/op...sser.html?_r=2

    and the under-$500,000 exemption for small farmers and small producers:
    http://billingsgazette.com/news/stat...257131ba7.html
    The little bee returns with evening's gloom,
    To join her comrades in the braided hive... -Tennyson

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    piedmont, KS
    Posts
    234

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    The new compromise amendment trims the miles to 275 and allows the FDA to revoke the exemption for any facility or farm associated with a foodborne illness.
    Doesn't help the small guy at all. 275 mile limitation will kill internet business dead in the water. Also will stop going to areas 500 miles to buy cattle or livestock for meat production. OR selling This stuff is already regulated to death.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Limestone Co, Alabama
    Posts
    1,675

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    Quote Originally Posted by Deeptime View Post
    Has anybody from the Beekeeping Industry reviewed this Senate bill?...
    I see Section 1 Paragraph M requiring male and female rest rooms in honey houses with Disabled access, an eye wash station, a shower, an employee changing area, hairnets, steril disposable clothing, hot water and anti-bacteria soap for hand washing with two doors or twenty feet between the restrooms and the honey house or anywhere honey, supers, or frames of comb are handled, stored, de-capped, extracted, filtered, or bottled. Also a professional vector pest control contract with at least a monthly inspection schedule. Please submit all evidence of your compliance with this requirement in triplicate.

    Submiting your honey to an outside lab for testing is a possibility, along with a new lab report sent to the government either every three days to annualy, depending on the size of your opperation. Remember the "Secetary" will likely classify the odd wax moth egg as an insect part. Now many insect parts are premited in a raw agricultural product that is made outdoors by insects?

    Your water may also need to be tested, as well as any standing or running water within say a mile of your hives. Mouse guards will become manditory since anyone with a microscope can find a mouse hair in a bee hive.

    There is also a good possibility that you will be required to heat your honey to a specified temperature either before bottling, selling or shipping. I believe this is easy for the Government to test for but hard for the beek to fake. At the very least the sale or trade in honey between beekeepers will soon become Verboten.

    What happens when your bees find an over turned soft drink truck and fills a few supers with orange blossom Nehi Honey. Won't it test positive for HFCS, artifical flavorings, and coloring?

    During the 70s and 80s the US Government burdened the American Auto Industry with clean air and milage regulations that fell more lightely upon Japanese car companies. I think we all know how that turned out. You better hope the government bails you out like they did GM or finds a partner to "invest" in you, like the government did for Chrysler.

    Is there any to big to fail beekeepers? On the light side, the system of grading honey will be scraped because it is based on "color."
    Scrapfe---Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.--Otto von Bismarck.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    McLean County, Illinois
    Posts
    166

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Orange, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    393

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    A lot of stuff I see in this is being misrepresented here.

    Bathrooms, eye wash stations and such are Safety and Health issue. You have to understand for this to apply you have to employee more than 10 personnel. You have to read connecting rules or laws to fully understand.

    Also you have to fund the bill once it becomes law. I will have to guess that most will not be funded in order for the law to work as written. Having said that, this bill could possible get into the backyard farms in the long term, but I do not see them assigning food or safety inspectors to check 1 or 2 man operations, plus lab fees for small operations.

    I noticed a law was pased in the senate this morning, I curious if that is this bill?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Paris, Maine
    Posts
    1,660

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    The Senate passed the bill today. Good. I hope the House hammers out the differences and passes it or simply approves the bill as passed overwhelmingly by the Senate.

    Even some of the most staunch opponents of Federal regulations concerning agriculture doesn't share some of the same "sky is falling" fears that have been presented in this thread as if they were actual facts.

    "Judith McGeary, executive director of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance, an advocacy group that sees government regulation as a threat to small farms, said she was satisfied with changes made to the bill to reduce paperwork for small farmers and exempt them from some requirements"

    Wayne

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lansing, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    186

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    Quote Originally Posted by ChristopherA View Post
    A lot of stuff I see in this is being misrepresented here.

    Bathrooms, eye wash stations and such are Safety and Health issue. You have to understand for this to apply you have to employee more than 10 personnel. You have to read connecting rules or laws to fully understand.
    you could hire everyone of your "employees" as an independent contractor and not even be responsible for the unemployment insurance.

    i heard on the radio today that there are measure in this bill to "protect" local and small business owners from having to implement many of the provisions because of cost. how true is it, i do not know, i like most, have not read the bill yet.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Douglasville, Georgia, USA
    Posts
    137

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    The bill will likely be blocked in the House because the Senate does not have Constitutional authority to initiate tax legislation. As currently written by the Senate the bill contains "fees" which are called "revenue raisers" but are taxes.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Orange, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    393

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    Quote Originally Posted by plaztikjezuz View Post
    you could hire everyone of your "employees" as an independent contractor and not even be responsible for the unemployment insurance.

    i heard on the radio today that there are measure in this bill to "protect" local and small business owners from having to implement many of the provisions because of cost. how true is it, i do not know, i like most, have not read the bill yet.
    You are correct about independant contractors. That is one easy way around a lot of legal mumbo jumbo. I will have to say, you might want to check the health care bill for implications on contractors. I dont remember the specifics, but I do remember something.

    Anything with fees has teeth and this bill does that. I guess we will see if it gets passed in the house to actually see what becomes of it.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Boring, OR
    Posts
    22

    Default Re: Senate Bill 510

    i read the bill and like all bills, it's an eye crosser. IF the bill were to implemented and enforced to the letter, the (perhaps) unintended consequences could be severe for all of us who engage in small farming and sales, including honey.
    my concern is that once you pass things like this, which is intended to make sure that no one ever, ever, ever, gets sick or dies from food products again....not counting just eating ourselves to death, you have opened the door to massive government intrusion.
    the next time someone gets sick, the bill will be redone, made "better", and of course, made more intrusive.

    my own opinion is that if you want a perfect world, you need to go on and die. short of that, life on this earth has risks, and the occasional bug in the food is one of them; and not such a bad thing maybe that we have some resistance?

    regardless, it appears that enforcement will be expensive and require a larger govt force to do the added inspections, etc. which might beg the question: can we even afford this kind of stuff right now?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Ads