Printable View
How about a demo of your grad school smarts?
Pick a pesticide, and estimate (based on the Johnson study) how much would partition into royal jelly from contaminated wax (using the Wu or Mullin study as a source for pesticide data).
Then, give an analysis of the effects on brood, etc., based on that.
Not enough info. You're the one who claims to know everything around here, so you go for it. I have a job.Quote:
Originally Posted by WLC
Is that symantics???:)Quote:
Originally Posted by SantaFeBeek
SF:
You're still in grad school? I meant Sol. There's enough information in each of the studies to do an estimate for the fractions in wax and honey (no royal jelly, but it will do).
Semantics are how humans communicate. To criticize their use is unwise.
I'm not going to be your bicycle riding bear. Do it yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by WLC
I bet you take good notes. :)
Application of knowledge is the key.
Bees won't make money??? was that a joke? I thought the demand was wayyyyy pass the supply?????Quote:
Originally Posted by Solomon Parker
I know that my country is only producing 8% of the demand here!
sorry to go a bit of topic! but would hate to think I just jumped into somthing that's not going to turn a profit, though i am enjoying it none the less.
Such studies have been done. Dr. Maryanne Frazier of Penn State is probably a good person to search for such studies. What I recall from talks at Bee Meetings is that the Pesticides are found in higher concentrations in beeswax than they are in honey, since most pesticides are oil based. Which doesn't mean they don't show up in Honey, just in lower trace amounts.Quote:
Originally Posted by SantaFeBeek
I don't know as much as I think I do and no where near as much as I wish I did. Not that I am going to work very hard to remedy the deficite. :)
I believe :D means joke.
I think everyone needs to go and indulge in their fav adult beverage, copiously, and lick their wounds:) JMHO:)
Must be the summer solstice,
Then try getting an egg to stand on end.
Well, no, I don't think we can estimate how many bees live on a frame. What would be the point. It's the larvae and pupae which are effected by the chemical residue found nin the comb. These chemicals are numerous, not simply one on it's own, but a mixture. That mixture is what Maryanne Frazier feels is most detrimental to the bee's development, because of the unknown interaction of the different chemicals.Quote:
Originally Posted by WLC
A Popeye laugh is heard :) aaakkkakakakakka,, something like that :)Quote:
Originally Posted by WLC
More like a tree or a web I would say. By what means are bees bringing in the chemical residues which come from pesticides not put in beehives by beekeepers? Is it in the nectyar? Is it in the pollen? Does it get on the bees body while foraging and gets transfered to the wax? Does contaminated nectar get made into wax, which is made into comb? All of the above?Quote:
Originally Posted by WLC
Queens do it all the time. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by WLC
I agree that metirc is best for doing the math (especially the way I do math). But 0.1mm is about 0.004" (which is a number I understand)...quite thick.
This is a bit OT, but....It has been suggested to me (and based on my experience in manufacturing I tend to believe it) that there is one area in which metric falls short of the english system...and that is in machining/manufacturing. Because of the physical properties and the processes of manufacture (turning, milling), it turns out that 0.001" is a very useful increment. With decently made machine tools, 0.001" tolerance is easily achievable...with excellent tools, 0.0005" is not a problem. Most machined fittings work happily with 0.001" tolerance (some applications require honing or grinding which are capable of tighter tolerances).
Not so much with metric. 0.1mm is about .004" (when I used to make handmade piccolos for a living, we used #71 and #73 drills for different operations...these are 0.026" and 0.23" in diameter...with some experience I could tell just by looking which one it was). ...but 0.01mm is 0.0004" ...a hard increment to machine accurately without the best of tooling. .1mm is too big to be a useful base measurement, and .01mm is too small. Yes, this is OT, but I can't let an opportunity go by without sticking it to the metric system :)
deknow
Yeah...but try asking her to make it stand on end for 3 days and see what happens!Quote:
Originally Posted by sqkcrk
deknow
The German incident was well documented to be caused by improper application / handling of the pesticide causing it to go airborne as dust and it was literally blown into the hives.Quote:
Originally Posted by cerezha
That said that incident was an anomolly and much different than the standard contact bees will have with the chemical and how it accumulates in the comb (which is the topic of this thread).
Knock off the snide remarks.Quote:
Originally Posted by WLC