BjornBee
02-17-2008, 07:57 AM
A year ago, I mentioned that Penn State officials were speaking at fruit growers meetings. That there was some serious talk about growers using alternative pollinators, and looking for solutions to the hysteria, hype, and claims to congress that the sky was falling. And although some denounced any such idea that honeybees were ever going to be replaced or another pollinator capable, it seems that many wheels have been spinning all the while.
I have heard of research in California and the almond industry. I know about talks and seminars at fruit growers association meetings. And a lot of other indicators that people are not sitting around doing nothing.
In the Feb 16, 2008 copy of the "Lancaster Farming", there is an article on page A18 entitled "Expert Sees Solitary Bees As Good Alternative To Depleted Honeybee Populations". (I can not seem to find an electronic form to post) It was based on a talk to the Mid-Atlantic Fruit and Vegetable convention, by professor of entomology Dr. Shelby Fliescher.
It mentions a Princeton research study, that compared solitary bees to honeybees at 23 farms in the northeast. And it showed that solitary bees are far superior pollinators as compared to honeybees. It also did mention the susceptibility of solitary bees to pesticides and other issues. There are some pro and con issues noted.
My point in mentioning this, was to show that people, researchers, and farmers, are all looking at options to traditional honeybee pollination. I think the attitude that honeybees are a guaranteed thing, and no concern should be taken, perhaps needs to be at least kept within reason. No doubt that when large university studies shows positives to alternative pollination options, and talks to large grower associations such as this take place, people are asking questions. The Lancaster farming newspaper is huge in readership in the farming community on the east coast
I see the phone at the bumblebee companies and those providing alternative pollination, ringing off the wall in the years to come. And I see most of the CCD related mess possibly being contributed to the honeybee industry itself. I see a bloody foot shot by the owner of the foot, then business being lost because of it.
I said it a year ago, and I'll say it again...when you go before congress and cry the blues, suggesting we have a problem in the industry that we can not deal with, that we have no control over, its not good. I questioned any backlash or negative impact, and was told that honeybee business would never be threatened or replaced on any scale. I did not agree then, and I don't agree now. When we stand up and suggest the food crops are in peril, that congress needs to get involved, that we are on the verge of collapse....things sometimes work in ways that was not intended. People will find other options. Other products will fill the gap. And it may never be more than a slice of the business, its still a slice.
Farmers and researchers are not at our mercy. We need to stop thinking they are. In the long run, it will hurt us. Farmers will find alternatives.
I have heard of research in California and the almond industry. I know about talks and seminars at fruit growers association meetings. And a lot of other indicators that people are not sitting around doing nothing.
In the Feb 16, 2008 copy of the "Lancaster Farming", there is an article on page A18 entitled "Expert Sees Solitary Bees As Good Alternative To Depleted Honeybee Populations". (I can not seem to find an electronic form to post) It was based on a talk to the Mid-Atlantic Fruit and Vegetable convention, by professor of entomology Dr. Shelby Fliescher.
It mentions a Princeton research study, that compared solitary bees to honeybees at 23 farms in the northeast. And it showed that solitary bees are far superior pollinators as compared to honeybees. It also did mention the susceptibility of solitary bees to pesticides and other issues. There are some pro and con issues noted.
My point in mentioning this, was to show that people, researchers, and farmers, are all looking at options to traditional honeybee pollination. I think the attitude that honeybees are a guaranteed thing, and no concern should be taken, perhaps needs to be at least kept within reason. No doubt that when large university studies shows positives to alternative pollination options, and talks to large grower associations such as this take place, people are asking questions. The Lancaster farming newspaper is huge in readership in the farming community on the east coast
I see the phone at the bumblebee companies and those providing alternative pollination, ringing off the wall in the years to come. And I see most of the CCD related mess possibly being contributed to the honeybee industry itself. I see a bloody foot shot by the owner of the foot, then business being lost because of it.
I said it a year ago, and I'll say it again...when you go before congress and cry the blues, suggesting we have a problem in the industry that we can not deal with, that we have no control over, its not good. I questioned any backlash or negative impact, and was told that honeybee business would never be threatened or replaced on any scale. I did not agree then, and I don't agree now. When we stand up and suggest the food crops are in peril, that congress needs to get involved, that we are on the verge of collapse....things sometimes work in ways that was not intended. People will find other options. Other products will fill the gap. And it may never be more than a slice of the business, its still a slice.
Farmers and researchers are not at our mercy. We need to stop thinking they are. In the long run, it will hurt us. Farmers will find alternatives.