|
From: Erik Osterlund <honeybee@elgon.se>
Date: Tue Dec 19, 2000 10:46am
Subject: Re: girls on small cells, regressing bees
Hi Dave and all
I respect you Dave
and admit I don't use all of
Dee's advice fully myself, due to certain bad
experiences. But I'm fascinated over the possibility her ideas
would work
also here where I live. It might. Someone has to try. At her
place it do
work for her and Ed. They are the proof for it. No doubt. And
they have
paid for coming there, loosing 90% of their stock over a number
of years.
If you have just a few hives it might be much more difficult
to follow all
the way down the road, but step by step, we might reach there.
Let's try.
Erik
>> Further, Inbreeding does not occur in Nature as routine
without something
>> forcing it to happen.At very most a queen might be inseminated
if she is
>> real special, but normally a good breeder can work around
it if he really
>> cares about what he is doing. Never tell beekeepers
to inbreed and then
>> think they can become good biological beekeepers without
problems in their
>> bees. Either you want to do it without crutches naturally
to gain strong
>> outbred lines or you don't.Inbreeding in animals results
in dead lines and
>> end of evolution for species and we seem to have enough
of that started
>> within the bee industry now.
>
>If we adopt a pure "survival of the fittest" policy
from the start then we
>lose the most susceptible strains of bee very quickly...It
could be that
>there are other traits in those susceptible strains that
we should be
>nurturing but have not yet recognised. Your ideals are a
wonderful aim...but
>let us fully analyse what
>we have available before we cut off some strains for ever.
|